From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg1-f198.google.com (mail-pg1-f198.google.com [209.85.215.198]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269BE6B000A for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 18:08:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pg1-f198.google.com with SMTP id o18-v6so2390670pgv.14 for ; Tue, 09 Oct 2018 15:08:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org. [140.211.169.12]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f9-v6si21294240pgh.325.2018.10.09.15.08.47 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Oct 2018 15:08:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 15:08:45 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm: workingset: add vmstat counter for shadow nodes Message-Id: <20181009150845.8656eb8ede045ca5f4cc4b21@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20181009184732.762-4-hannes@cmpxchg.org> References: <20181009184732.762-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org> <20181009184732.762-4-hannes@cmpxchg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Johannes Weiner Cc: Rik van Riel , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 14:47:32 -0400 Johannes Weiner wrote: > --- a/mm/workingset.c > +++ b/mm/workingset.c > @@ -378,11 +378,17 @@ void workingset_update_node(struct xa_node *node) > * as node->private_list is protected by the i_pages lock. > */ > if (node->count && node->count == node->nr_values) { > - if (list_empty(&node->private_list)) > + if (list_empty(&node->private_list)) { > list_lru_add(&shadow_nodes, &node->private_list); > + __inc_lruvec_page_state(virt_to_page(node), > + WORKINGSET_NODES); > + } > } else { > - if (!list_empty(&node->private_list)) > + if (!list_empty(&node->private_list)) { > list_lru_del(&shadow_nodes, &node->private_list); > + __dec_lruvec_page_state(virt_to_page(node), > + WORKINGSET_NODES); > + } > } > } A bit worried that we're depending on the caller's caller to have disabled interrupts to avoid subtle and rare errors. Can we do this? --- a/mm/workingset.c~mm-workingset-add-vmstat-counter-for-shadow-nodes-fix +++ a/mm/workingset.c @@ -377,6 +377,8 @@ void workingset_update_node(struct radix * already where they should be. The list_empty() test is safe * as node->private_list is protected by the i_pages lock. */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled()); /* For __inc_lruvec_page_state */ + if (node->count && node->count == node->exceptional) { if (list_empty(&node->private_list)) { list_lru_add(&shadow_nodes, &node->private_list); _