From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: get pfn by page_to_pfn() instead of save in page->private
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 14:19:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181018141926.zjiebfjcodthvagg@master> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181018133917.GO5819@techsingularity.net>
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 02:39:17PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 09:04:29PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>> This is not necessary to save the pfn to page->private.
>>
>> The pfn could be retrieved by page_to_pfn() directly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
>
>page_to_pfn is not free which is why it's cached.
>
Hi, Mel
Thanks for your response.
Not free means the access to mem_section?
I have thought about the cache thing, so we assume the list is not that
long, and the cache could hold those page->private for the whole loop?
In my understand, it the cache has limited size, if more data accessed
the cache will be overwritten.
And another thing is:
In case of CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, would this be a little different?
Becase we get pfn by a simple addition. Which I think no need to cache
it?
Well, let me take a chance to say thanks to all, Mel, Michael and
Matthew. Hope my silly question won't bother you too much. :-)
>--
>Mel Gorman
>SUSE Labs
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-18 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-18 13:04 [PATCH] mm: get pfn by page_to_pfn() instead of save in page->private Wei Yang
2018-10-18 13:10 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-10-18 13:15 ` Michal Hocko
2018-10-18 14:10 ` Wei Yang
2018-10-18 16:30 ` Michal Hocko
2018-10-19 3:32 ` Wei Yang
2018-10-18 13:39 ` Mel Gorman
2018-10-18 14:19 ` Wei Yang [this message]
2018-10-18 14:53 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181018141926.zjiebfjcodthvagg@master \
--to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).