From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ed1-f72.google.com (mail-ed1-f72.google.com [209.85.208.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CBA76B0006 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 13:01:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-ed1-f72.google.com with SMTP id l51-v6so25040186edc.14 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 10:01:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cw21-v6si1543214ejb.52.2018.10.22.10.01.50 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Oct 2018 10:01:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 19:01:46 +0200 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: Memory management issue in 4.18.15 Message-ID: <20181022170146.GI18839@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20181022083322.GE32333@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20181022150815.GA4287@tower.DHCP.thefacebook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181022150815.GA4287@tower.DHCP.thefacebook.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Roman Gushchin , Sasha Levin Cc: Spock , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Rik van Riel , Johannes Weiner , Vladimir Davydov , Shakeel Butt , Andrew Morton , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "linux-mm@kvack.org" On Mon 22-10-18 15:08:22, Roman Gushchin wrote: [...] > RE backporting: I'm slightly surprised that only one patch of the memcg > reclaim fix series has been backported. Either all or none makes much more > sense to me. Yeah, I think this is AUTOSEL trying to be clever again. I though it has been agreed that MM is quite good at marking patches for stable and so it was not considered by the machinery. Sasha? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs