From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Paweł Staszewski" <pstaszewski@itcare.pl>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@redhat.com>,
"Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
"Tariq Toukan" <tariqt@mellanox.com>,
"Ilias Apalodimas" <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
"Yoel Caspersen" <yoel@kviknet.dk>,
"Mel Gorman" <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
"Saeed Mahameed" <saeedm@mellanox.com>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"Alexander Duyck" <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/page_alloc: use a single function to free page
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 19:20:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181106112033.GB24198@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30aa9d1f-d619-c143-3de6-6876029538bc@suse.cz>
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 10:32:00AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 11/6/18 9:47 AM, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 09:16:20AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >> On 11/6/18 6:30 AM, Aaron Lu wrote:
> >>> We have multiple places of freeing a page, most of them doing similar
> >>> things and a common function can be used to reduce code duplicate.
> >>>
> >>> It also avoids bug fixed in one function but left in another.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >> I assume there's no arch that would run page_ref_sub_and_test(1) slower
> >> than put_page_testzero(), for the critical __free_pages() case?
> >
> > Good question.
> >
> > I followed the non-arch specific calls and found that:
> > page_ref_sub_and_test() ends up calling atomic_sub_return(i, v) while
> > put_page_testzero() ends up calling atomic_sub_return(1, v). So they
> > should be same for archs that do not have their own implementations.
>
> x86 seems to distinguish between DECL and SUBL, see
Ah right.
> arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h although I could not figure out where does
> e.g. arch_atomic_dec_and_test become atomic_dec_and_test to override the
> generic implementation.
I didn't check that either but I think it will :-)
> I don't know if the CPU e.g. executes DECL faster, but objectively it
> has one parameter less. Maybe it doesn't matter?
No immediate idea.
> > Back to your question: I don't know either.
> > If this is deemed unsafe, we can probably keep the ref modify part in
> > their original functions and only take the free part into a common
> > function.
>
> I guess you could also employ if (__builtin_constant_p(nr)) in
> free_the_page(), but the result will be ugly I guess, and maybe not
> worth it :)
Right I can't make it clean.
I think I'll just move the free part a common function and leave the ref
decreasing part as is to be safe.
Regards,
Aaron
> >>> ---
> >>> v2: move comments close to code as suggested by Dave.
> >>>
> >>> mm/page_alloc.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++--------------------
> >>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> >>> index 91a9a6af41a2..4faf6b7bf225 100644
> >>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> >>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> >>> @@ -4425,9 +4425,17 @@ unsigned long get_zeroed_page(gfp_t gfp_mask)
> >>> }
> >>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_zeroed_page);
> >>>
> >>> -void __free_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> >>> +static inline void free_the_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order, int nr)
> >>> {
> >>> - if (put_page_testzero(page)) {
> >>> + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_ref_count(page) == 0, page);
> >>> +
> >>> + /*
> >>> + * Free a page by reducing its ref count by @nr.
> >>> + * If its refcount reaches 0, then according to its order:
> >>> + * order0: send to PCP;
> >>> + * high order: directly send to Buddy.
> >>> + */
> >>> + if (page_ref_sub_and_test(page, nr)) {
> >>> if (order == 0)
> >>> free_unref_page(page);
> >>> else
> >>> @@ -4435,6 +4443,10 @@ void __free_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> >>> }
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> +void __free_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> >>> +{
> >>> + free_the_page(page, order, 1);
> >>> +}
> >>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__free_pages);
> >>>
> >>> void free_pages(unsigned long addr, unsigned int order)
> >>> @@ -4481,16 +4493,7 @@ static struct page *__page_frag_cache_refill(struct page_frag_cache *nc,
> >>>
> >>> void __page_frag_cache_drain(struct page *page, unsigned int count)
> >>> {
> >>> - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_ref_count(page) == 0, page);
> >>> -
> >>> - if (page_ref_sub_and_test(page, count)) {
> >>> - unsigned int order = compound_order(page);
> >>> -
> >>> - if (order == 0)
> >>> - free_unref_page(page);
> >>> - else
> >>> - __free_pages_ok(page, order);
> >>> - }
> >>> + free_the_page(page, compound_order(page), count);
> >>> }
> >>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__page_frag_cache_drain);
> >>>
> >>> @@ -4555,14 +4558,7 @@ void page_frag_free(void *addr)
> >>> {
> >>> struct page *page = virt_to_head_page(addr);
> >>>
> >>> - if (unlikely(put_page_testzero(page))) {
> >>> - unsigned int order = compound_order(page);
> >>> -
> >>> - if (order == 0)
> >>> - free_unref_page(page);
> >>> - else
> >>> - __free_pages_ok(page, order);
> >>> - }
> >>> + free_the_page(page, compound_order(page), 1);
> >>> }
> >>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(page_frag_free);
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-06 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-05 8:58 [PATCH 1/2] mm/page_alloc: free order-0 pages through PCP in page_frag_free() Aaron Lu
2018-11-05 8:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/page_alloc: use a single function to free page Aaron Lu
2018-11-05 16:39 ` Dave Hansen
2018-11-06 5:30 ` [PATCH v2 " Aaron Lu
2018-11-06 8:16 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-11-06 8:47 ` Aaron Lu
2018-11-06 9:32 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-11-06 11:20 ` Aaron Lu [this message]
2018-11-06 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 " Aaron Lu
2018-11-06 12:06 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-11-05 9:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/page_alloc: free order-0 pages through PCP in page_frag_free() Vlastimil Babka
2018-11-05 9:26 ` Mel Gorman
2018-11-05 9:55 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-11-05 10:46 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2018-11-05 15:44 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-10 23:54 ` Paweł Staszewski
2018-11-11 23:05 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-12 0:39 ` Paweł Staszewski
2018-11-12 15:30 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-12 15:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-11-12 17:06 ` Paweł Staszewski
2018-11-12 17:01 ` Paweł Staszewski
2018-11-05 16:37 ` Dave Hansen
2018-11-06 5:28 ` [PATCH v2 " Aaron Lu
2018-11-07 9:59 ` Tariq Toukan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181106112033.GB24198@intel.com \
--to=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pstaszewski@itcare.pl \
--cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
--cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=yoel@kviknet.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).