From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] xfs: drop ->writepage completely
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 07:12:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181109151239.GD9153@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181107063127.3902-2-david@fromorbit.com>
[adding linux-mm to the CC list]
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 05:31:12PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> ->writepage is only used in one place - single page writeback from
> memory reclaim. We only allow such writeback from kswapd, not from
> direct memory reclaim, and so it is rarely used. When it comes from
> kswapd, it is effectively random dirty page shoot-down, which is
> horrible for IO patterns. We will already have background writeback
> trying to clean all the dirty pages in memory as efficiently as
> possible, so having kswapd interrupt our well formed IO stream only
> slows things down. So get rid of xfs_vm_writepage() completely.
Interesting. IFF we can pull this off it would simplify a lot of
things, so I'm generally in favor of it.
->writepage callers in generic code are:
(1) mm/vmscan.c:pageout() - this is the kswaped (or direct reclaim) you
mention above. It basically does nothing in this case which isn't
great, but the whole point of this patch..
(2) mm/migrate.c:writeout() - this is only called if no ->migratepage
method is presend, but we have one in XFS, so we should be ok.
Plus a few pieces of code that are just library functions like
generic_writepages and mpage_writepages.
next parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-09 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20181107063127.3902-1-david@fromorbit.com>
[not found] ` <20181107063127.3902-2-david@fromorbit.com>
2018-11-09 15:12 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-11-12 21:08 ` [PATCH 01/16] xfs: drop ->writepage completely Dave Chinner
2021-02-02 20:51 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181109151239.GD9153@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).