From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: use managed_zone() for more exact check in zone iteration
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 11:24:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181116102405.GF14706@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181114235040.36180-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
On Thu 15-11-18 07:50:40, Wei Yang wrote:
[...]
> @@ -1193,8 +1196,8 @@ static unsigned int count_free_highmem_pages(void)
> struct zone *zone;
> unsigned int cnt = 0;
>
> - for_each_populated_zone(zone)
> - if (is_highmem(zone))
> + for_each_zone(zone)
> + if (populated_zone(zone) && is_highmem(zone))
> cnt += zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES);
this should be for_each_managed_zone because we only care about highmem
zones which have pages in the allocator (NR_FREE_PAGES).
>
> return cnt;
> @@ -1239,10 +1242,10 @@ static unsigned int count_highmem_pages(void)
> struct zone *zone;
> unsigned int n = 0;
>
> - for_each_populated_zone(zone) {
> + for_each_zone(zone) {
> unsigned long pfn, max_zone_pfn;
>
> - if (!is_highmem(zone))
> + if (!populated_zone(zone) || !is_highmem(zone))
> continue;
>
> mark_free_pages(zone);
I am not familiar with this code much but I strongly suspect that we do
want for_each_managed_zone here because saveable_highmem_page skips over
all reserved pages which rules out the bootmem. But this should be
double checked with Rafael (Cc-ed).
Rafael, does this loop care about pages which are not managed by the
page allocator?
> @@ -1305,8 +1308,8 @@ static unsigned int count_data_pages(void)
> unsigned long pfn, max_zone_pfn;
> unsigned int n = 0;
>
> - for_each_populated_zone(zone) {
> - if (is_highmem(zone))
> + for_each_zone(zone) {
> + if (!populated_zone(zone) || is_highmem(zone))
> continue;
>
> mark_free_pages(zone);
> @@ -1399,9 +1402,12 @@ static void copy_data_pages(struct memory_bitmap *copy_bm,
> struct zone *zone;
> unsigned long pfn;
>
> - for_each_populated_zone(zone) {
> + for_each_zone(zone) {
> unsigned long max_zone_pfn;
>
> + if (!populated_zone(zone))
> + continue;
> +
> mark_free_pages(zone);
> max_zone_pfn = zone_end_pfn(zone);
> for (pfn = zone->zone_start_pfn; pfn < max_zone_pfn; pfn++)
> @@ -1717,7 +1723,10 @@ int hibernate_preallocate_memory(void)
> saveable += save_highmem;
> highmem = save_highmem;
> size = 0;
> - for_each_populated_zone(zone) {
> + for_each_zone(zone) {
> + if (!populated_zone(zone))
> + continue;
> +
> size += snapshot_additional_pages(zone);
> if (is_highmem(zone))
> highmem += zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES);
ditto for the above.
> @@ -1863,8 +1872,8 @@ static int enough_free_mem(unsigned int nr_pages, unsigned int nr_highmem)
> struct zone *zone;
> unsigned int free = alloc_normal;
>
> - for_each_populated_zone(zone)
> - if (!is_highmem(zone))
> + for_each_zone(zone)
> + if (populated_zone(zone) && !is_highmem(zone))
> free += zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES);
>
> nr_pages += count_pages_for_highmem(nr_highmem);
This one should be for_each_managed_zone (NR_FREE_PAGES)
The rest looks good to me.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-16 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-14 23:50 [PATCH] mm: use managed_zone() for more exact check in zone iteration Wei Yang
2018-11-15 21:37 ` Andrew Morton
2018-11-16 4:41 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-16 9:57 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-16 11:05 ` osalvador
2018-11-16 11:26 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-16 15:58 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-16 17:07 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-16 10:24 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2018-11-21 3:05 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181116102405.GF14706@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).