From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl1-f200.google.com (mail-pl1-f200.google.com [209.85.214.200]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B906B27D9 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 10:16:38 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pl1-f200.google.com with SMTP id m13so14316850pls.15 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 07:16:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org. [2607:7c80:54:e::133]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y3-v6si49572146pfe.42.2018.11.22.07.16.37 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 22 Nov 2018 07:16:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 07:16:32 -0800 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s: Use DMA32 zone for page tables Message-ID: <20181122151632.GP3065@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <20181111090341.120786-1-drinkcat@chromium.org> <0100016737801f14-84f1265d-4577-4dcf-ad57-90dbc8e0a78f-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20181121213853.GL3065@bombadil.infradead.org> <20181122023558.GO3065@bombadil.infradead.org> <20181122082602.GB2049@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181122082602.GB2049@infradead.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Robin Murphy , Michal Hocko , Will Deacon , Levin Alexander , linux-mm@kvack.org, Christopher Lameter , Nicolas Boichat , Huaisheng Ye , David Rientjes , yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com, Vlastimil Babka , Tomasz Figa , Mike Rapoport , Matthias Brugger , Joonsoo Kim , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pekka Enberg , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 12:26:02AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 06:35:58PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > I think you should look at using the page_frag allocator here. You can > > use whatever GFP_DMA flags you like. > > So I actually tries to use page_frag to solve the XFS unaligned kmalloc > allocations problem, and I don't think it is the right hammer for this > nail (or any other nail outside of networking). > > The problem with the page_frag allocator is that it never reuses > fragments returned to the page, but only only frees the page once all > fragments are freed. This means that if you have some long(er) term > allocations you are effectively creating memory leaks. Yes, your allocations from the page_frag allocator have to have similar lifetimes. I thought that would be ideal for XFS though; as I understood the problem, these were per-IO allocations, and IOs to the same filesystem tend to take roughly the same amount of time. Sure, in an error case, some IOs will take a long time before timing out, but it should be OK to have pages unavailable during that time in these rare situations. What am I missing?