Re: [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: calculate first_deferred_pfn directly

Alexander Duyck
2018-12-24T17:50:17Z

On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 11:50 PM Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 05:41:30PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >On 12/21/2018 4:22 PM, Wei Yang wrote:
> >> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 03:45:40PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 2018-12-21 at 22:44 +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
> >> > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 03:47:53PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >> > > > On Fri, 2018-12-07 at 18:08 +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
> >> > > > > After commit c9e97a1997fb ("mm: initialize pages on demand during
> >> > > > > boot"), the behavior of DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT is changed to
> >> > > > > initialize first section for highest zone on each node.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Instead of test each pfn during iteration, we could calculate the
> >> > > > > first_deferred_pfn directly with necessary information.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > By doing so, we also get some performance benefit during bootup:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > +----------+-----------+-----------+--------+
> >> > > > > | |Base |Patched |Gain |
> >> > > > > +----------+-----------+-----------+--------+
> >> > > > > | 1 Node |0.011993 |0.011459 |-4.45% |
> >> > > > > +----------+-----------+-----------+--------+
> >> > > > > | 4 Nodes |0.006466 |0.006255 |-3.26% |
> >> > > > > +----------+-----------+-----------+--------+
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Test result is retrieved from dmesg time stamp by add printk around
> >> > > > > free_area_init_nodes().
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
> >> > >
> >> > > Hi, Alexander
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks for your comment!
> >> > >
> >> > > > I'm pretty sure the fundamental assumption made in this patch is wrong.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > It is assuming that the first deferred PFN will just be your start PFN
> >> > > > + PAGES_PER_SECTION aligned to the nearest PAGES_PER_SECTION, do I have
> >> > > > that correct?
> >> > >
> >> > > You are right.
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > If I am not mistaken that can result in scenarios where you actually
> >> > > > start out with 0 pages allocated if your first section is in a span
> >> > > > belonging to another node, or is reserved memory for things like MMIO.
> >> > >
> >> > > Yeah, sounds it is possible.
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Ideally we don't want to do that as we have to immediately jump into
> >> > > > growing the zone with the code as it currently stands.
> >> > >
> >> > > You are right.
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > ---
> >> > > > > mm/page_alloc.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
> >> > > > > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> >> > > > > index baf473f80800..5f077bf07f3e 100644
> >> > > > > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> >> > > > > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> >> > > > > @@ -306,38 +306,33 @@ static inline bool __meminit early_page_uninitialised(unsigned long pfn)
> >> > > > > }
> >> > > > > /*
> >> > > > > - * Returns true when the remaining initialisation should be deferred until
> >> > > > > - * later in the boot cycle when it can be parallelised.
> >> > > > > + * Calculate first_deferred_pfn in case:
> >> > > > > + * - in MEMMAP_EARLY context
> >> > > > > + * - this is the last zone
> >> > > > > + *
> >> > > > > + * If the first aligned section doesn't exceed the end_pfn, set it to
> >> > > > > + * first_deferred_pfn and return it.
> >> > > > > */
> >> > > > > -static bool __meminit
> >> > > > > -defer_init(int nid, unsigned long pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> >> > > > > +unsigned long __meminit
> >> > > > > +defer_pfn(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
> >> > > > > + enum memmap_context context)
> >> > > > > {
> >> > > > > - static unsigned long prev_end_pfn, nr_initialised;
> >> > > > > + struct pglist_data *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
> >> > > > > + unsigned long pfn;
> >> > > > > - /*
> >> > > > > - * prev_end_pfn static that contains the end of previous zone
> >> > > > > - * No need to protect because called very early in boot before smp_init.
> >> > > > > - */
> >> > > > > - if (prev_end_pfn != end_pfn) {
> >> > > > > - prev_end_pfn = end_pfn;
> >> > > > > - nr_initialised = 0;
> >> > > > > - }
> >> > > > > + if (context != MEMMAP_EARLY)
> >> > > > > + return end_pfn;
> >> > > > > - /* Always populate low zones for address-constrained allocations */
> >> > > > > - if (end_pfn < pgdat_end_pfn(NODE_DATA(nid)))
> >> > > > > - return false;
> >> > > > > + /* Always populate low zones */
> >> > > > > + if (end_pfn < pgdat_end_pfn(pgdat))
> >> > > > > + return end_pfn;
> >> > > > > - /*
> >> > > > > - * We start only with one section of pages, more pages are added as
> >> > > > > - * needed until the rest of deferred pages are initialized.
> >> > > > > - */
> >> > > > > - nr_initialised++;
> >> > > > > - if ((nr_initialised > PAGES_PER_SECTION) &&
> >> > > > > - (pfn & (PAGES_PER_SECTION - 1)) == 0) {
> >> > > > > - NODE_DATA(nid)->first_deferred_pfn = pfn;
> >> > > > > - return true;
> >> > > > > + pfn = roundup(start_pfn + PAGES_PER_SECTION - 1, PAGES_PER_SECTION);
> >> > > > > + if (end_pfn > pfn) {
> >> > > > > + pgdat->first_deferred_pfn = pfn;
> >> > > > > + end_pfn = pfn;
> >> > > > > }
> >> > > > > - return false;
> >> > > > > + return end_pfn;
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Okay so I stand corrected. It looks like you are rounding up by
> >> > > > (PAGES_PER_SECTION - 1) * 2 since if I am not mistaken roundup should
> >> > > > do the same math you already did in side the function.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > }
> >> > > > > #else
> >> > > > > static inline bool early_page_uninitialised(unsigned long pfn)
> >> > > > > @@ -345,9 +340,11 @@ static inline bool early_page_uninitialised(unsigned long pfn)
> >> > > > > return false;
> >> > > > > }
> >> > > > > -static inline bool defer_init(int nid, unsigned long pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> >> > > > > +unsigned long __meminit
> >> > > > > +defer_pfn(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
> >> > > > > + enum memmap_context context)
> >> > > > > {
> >> > > > > - return false;
> >> > > > > + return end_pfn;
> >> > > > > }
> >> > > > > #endif
> >> > > > > @@ -5514,6 +5511,8 @@ void __meminit memmap_init_zone(unsigned long size, int nid, unsigned long zone,
> >> > > > > }
> >> > > > > #endif
> >> > > > > + end_pfn = defer_pfn(nid, start_pfn, end_pfn, context);
> >> > > > > +
> >> > > >
> >> > > > A better approach for this might be to look at placing the loop within
> >> > > > a loop similar to how I handled this for the deferred init. You only
> >> > > > really need to be performing all of these checks once per section
> >> > > > aligned point anyway.
> >> > >
> >> > > I didn't really get your idea here. Do you have the commit id you handle
> >> > > deferred init?
> >> >
> >> > The deferred_grow_zone function actually had some logic like this
> >> > before I had rewritten it, you can still find it on lxr:
> >> > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/mm/page_alloc.c#L1668
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Basically if you added another loop and limited the loop below so that
> >> > > > you only fed it one section at a time then you could just pull the
> >> > > > defer_init check out of this section and place it in the outer loop
> >> > > > after you have already tried initializing at least one section worth of
> >> > > > pages.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > You could probably also look at pulling in the logic that is currently
> >> > > > sitting at the end of the current function that is initializing things
> >> > > > until the end_pfn is aligned with PAGES_PER_SECTION.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++) {
> >> > > > > /*
> >> > > > > * There can be holes in boot-time mem_map[]s handed to this
> >> > > > > @@ -5526,8 +5525,6 @@ void __meminit memmap_init_zone(unsigned long size, int nid, unsigned long zone,
> >> > > > > continue;
> >> > > > > if (overlap_memmap_init(zone, &pfn))
> >> > > > > continue;
> >> > > > > - if (defer_init(nid, pfn, end_pfn))
> >> > > > > - break;
> >> > > > > }
> >> > > >
> >> > > > So the whole reason for the "defer_init" call being placed here is
> >> > > > because there are checks to see if the prior PFN is valid, in our NUMA
> >> > > > node, or is an overlapping region. If your first section or in this
> >> > > > case 2 sections contain pages that fall into these categories you
> >> > > > aren't going to initialize any pages.
> >> > >
> >> > > Ok, I get your point. Let me do a summary, the approach in this patch
> >> > > has one flaw: in case all pages in the first section fall into these two
> >> > > categories, we will end up with no page initialized for this zone.
> >> > >
> >> > > So my suggestion is:
> >> > >
> >> > > Find the first valid page and roundup it to PAGES_PER_SECTION. This
> >> > > would ensure we won't end up with zero initialized page.
> >> >
> >> > Using the first valid PFN will not work either. The problem is you want
> >> > to ideally have PAGES_PER_SECTION number of pages allocated before we
> >> > begin deferring allocation. The pages will have a number of regions
> >> > that are reserved and/or full of holes so you cannot rely on the first
> >> > PFN to be the start of a contiguous section of pages.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Hmm... my original idea is we don't need to initialize at least
> >> PAGES_PER_SECTION pages before defer init. In my mind, we just need to
> >> initialize *some* pages for this zone. The worst case is there is only
> >> one page initialized at bootup.
> >>
> >> So here is the version with a little change to cope with the situation
> >> when the whole section is not available.
> >>
> >> for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < enf_pfn; pfn++) {
> >> if (!early_pfn_valid(pfn))
> >> continue;
> >> if (!early_pfn_in_nid(pfn, nid))
> >> continue;
> >> if (overlap_memmap_init(zone, &pfn))
> >> continue;
> >>
> >> break;
> >> }
> >>
> >> pfn = round_up(pfn + 1, PAGES_PER_SECTION);
> >>
> >> if (end_pfn > pfn) {
> >> pgdat->first_deferred_pfn = pfn;
> >> end_pfn = pfn;
> >> }
> >>
> >
> >This would have you updating your first_deferred_pfn for every valid pfn. I
> >don't think that is what you want.
>
> It break out at the first valid pfn, so it update first_deferred_pfn
> once on the first valid pfn. Is my logic in code incorrect?

It is possible we might be discussing too much via pseudocode. The key
bit is that you aren't supposed to break out on an unaligned section.
You need to break out aligned with the PAGES_PER_SECTION value.

> >
> >> And here is the version if we want to count the number of valid pages.
> >>
> >> for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < enf_pfn; pfn++) {
> >> if (!early_pfn_valid(pfn))
> >> continue;
> >> if (!early_pfn_in_nid(pfn, nid))
> >> continue;
> >> if (overlap_memmap_init(zone, &pfn))
> >> continue;
> >>
> >> if (++valid_pfns == PAGES_PER_SECTION)
> >> break;
> >> }
> >>
> >
> >Your break condition here is wrong. You don't want to break out if the number
> >of valid_pfns is equal to PAGES_PER_SECTION, you want to break out if pfn is
> >aligned to PAGES_PER_SECTION.
> >
> >> pfn = round_up(pfn + 1, PAGES_PER_SECTION);
>
> Hmm... here it align pfn to PAGES_PER_SECTION. The loop above makes sure
> there are one section pages initialized during bootup.

You are aligning the deferred PFN, but the PFN you break out on is
unaligned. So what are you doing about the pages in between?

> >>
> >> if (end_pfn > pfn) {
> >> pgdat->first_deferred_pfn = pfn;
> >> end_pfn = pfn;
> >> }
> >>
> >
> >This is even more incorrect then the original patch.
> >
> >> > > Generally, my purpose in this patch is:
> >> > >
> >> > > 1. Don't affect the initialisation for non defer init zones.
> >> > > Current code will call defer_init() for each pfn, no matter this pfn
> >> > > should be defer_init or not. By taking this out, we try to minimize
> >> > > the effect on the initialisation process.
> >> >
> >> > So one problem with trying to pull out defer_init is that it contains
> >> > the increment nr_initialized. At a minimum that logic should probably
> >> > be pulled out and placed back where it was.
> >> >
> >> > > 2. Iterate on less pfn for defer zone
> >> > > Current code will count on each pfn in defer zone. By roundup pfn
> >> > > directly, less calculation would be necessary. Defer init will handle
> >> > > the rest. Or if we really want at least PAGES_PER_SECTION pfn be
> >> > > initialized for defer zone, we can do the same math in defer_pfn().
> >> >
> >> > So the general idea I was referring to above would be something like:
> >> > for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn;) {
> >> > t = ALIGN_DOWN(pfn + PAGES_PER_SECTION, PAGES_PER_SECTION);
> >> > first_deferred_pfn = min(t, end_pfn);
> >> > section_initialized = 0;
> >> >
> >> > for (; pfn < first_deferred_pfn; pfn++) {
> >> > struct page *page;
> >> >
> >> > /* All or original checks here w/ continue */
> >> >
> >> > /* all of the original page initialization stuff */
> >> >
> >> > section_initialized++;
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > /* Place all the original checks for deferred init here */
> >> >
> >> > nr_initialized += section_initialized;
> >> >
> >> > /* remaining checks for deferred init to see if we exit/break here */
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > The general idea is the same as what you have stated. However with this
> >> > approach we should be able to count the number of pages initialized and
> >> > once per section we will either just drop the results stored in
> >> > section_initialized, or we will add them to the initialized count and
> >> > if it exceeds the needed value we could then break out of the loop.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Yep, it looks we share similar idea. While I take the initialization
> >> part out and just count the pfn ahead. And use this pfn for the loop.
> >>
> >> Do you think I understand you correctly?
> >>
> >
> >There are two pieces to this. One is tracking the number of PFNs that you
> >have initialized in a given section. We need to do that and the overhead
> >should be pretty light since it is just an increment. It would probably be
> >only one or two instructions manipulating a local variable, possibly even a
> >register.
> >
>
> Yes, the effort to count for defer zone is not huge, while the function
> defer_ini() will be called for each pfn in non-defer zone.

The counting itself should be cheap. You just need to avoid all the
extra conditional checks on every PFN. That is why I suggested
breaking it up into two counters. One that is reset per section and
one that aggregates the counts of those sections that we care about.

> >The other bit is to see if we even care about the section/zone and if we
> >should do something with the count of pages initialized in it. That check
> >should be done once at the end of every section we initialize. I would say we
> >should aim for trying to initialize at least a section number worth of pages.
>
> If we have to initialize PAGES_PER_SECTION pages, my approach is not
> better than current one. :)

It could be. The one other thing I am not sure about is if we
absolutely have to initialize a section worth of pages or if we just
have to do 1 << MAX_ORDER number of pages. All the comments I have
read seem to indicate MAX_ORDER is the hard requirement because of the
fact that free_pages_<whatever> will end up trying to do the creation
of a max order page as the pages are freed into the buddy allocator.
So you could try experimenting with code around that if you are still
wanting to try to allocate less than a section worth of pages.

> >I admit it is kind of arbitrary, but if we don't do that then the work falls
> >back to deferred_grow_zone and that is resorting to allocating a section
> >number worth of pages so one way or another we will end up having to do that
> >anyway.
> >
> >We should be section aligned in order to keep the later freeing of the pages
> >from blowing up due to accessing an uninitialized page.
> >
> >> > >
> >> > > Glad to talk with you and look forward your comments:-)
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >>
>
> --
> Wei Yang
> Help you, Help me
>