From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Burt Holzman <burt@fnal.gov>,
"vdavydov.dev@gmail.com" <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
"cgroups@vger.kernel.org" <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: OOM notification for cgroupsv1 broken in 4.19
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 14:02:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181221190210.GB5395@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181221153302.GB6410@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 04:33:02PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From 51633f683173013741f4d0ab3e31bae575341c55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 16:28:29 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] memcg, oom: notify on oom killer invocation from the charge
> path
>
> Burt Holzman has noticed that memcg v1 doesn't notify about OOM events
> via eventfd anymore. The reason is that 29ef680ae7c2 ("memcg, oom: move
> out_of_memory back to the charge path") has moved the oom handling back
> to the charge path. While doing so the notification was left behind in
> mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize.
>
> Fix the issue by replicating the oom hierarchy locking and the
> notification.
>
> Reported-by: Burt Holzman <burt@fnal.gov>
> Fixes: 29ef680ae7c2 ("memcg, oom: move out_of_memory back to the charge path")
> Cc: stable # 4.19+
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Looks good to me. The async side really does too much other stuff to
cleanly share code between them, so I don't mind separate code even if
it means they both have to do the mark, lock, notify dance.
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-21 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-21 14:49 OOM notification for cgroupsv1 broken in 4.19 Burt Holzman
2018-12-21 15:33 ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-21 15:33 ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-21 17:33 ` Burt Holzman
2018-12-21 19:02 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2018-12-24 9:11 ` [PATCH] memcg, oom: notify on oom killer invocation from the charge path Michal Hocko
2018-12-24 9:11 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181221190210.GB5395@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=burt@fnal.gov \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox