From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <owner-linux-mm@kvack.org>
Received: from mail-pf1-f199.google.com (mail-pf1-f199.google.com [209.85.210.199])
	by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C5B8E0001
	for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 11:37:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail-pf1-f199.google.com with SMTP id 74so18601749pfk.12
        for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 08:37:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com. [134.134.136.31])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b11si3622694pgt.289.2019.01.22.08.37.53
        for <linux-mm@kvack.org>
        (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Tue, 22 Jan 2019 08:37:53 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 09:36:50 -0700
From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 05/13] Documentation/ABI: Add new node sysfs attributes
Message-ID: <20190122163650.GD1477@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20190116175804.30196-1-keith.busch@intel.com>
 <20190116175804.30196-6-keith.busch@intel.com>
 <CAJZ5v0jmkyrNBHzqHsOuWjLXF34tq83VnEhdBWrdFqxyiXC=cw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPcyv4gH0_e_NFJNOFH4XXarSs7+TOj4nT0r-D33ZGNCfqBdxg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190119090129.GC10836@kroah.com>
 <CAJZ5v0jxuLPUvwr-hYstgC-7BKDwqkJpep94rnnUFvFhKG4W3g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0jxuLPUvwr-hYstgC-7BKDwqkJpep94rnnUFvFhKG4W3g@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
List-ID: <linux-mm.kvack.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>

On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 05:16:05PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 10:01 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > If you do a subdirectory "correctly" (i.e. a name for an attribute
> > group), that's fine.
> 
> Yes, that's what I was thinking about: along the lines of the "power"
> group under device kobjects.

We can't append symlinks to an attribute group, though. I'd need to create
a lot of struct devices just to get the desired directory hiearchy. And
then each of those "devices" will have their own "power" group, which
really doesn't make any sense for what we're trying to show. Is that
really the right way to do this, or something else I'm missing?