From: jglisse@redhat.com
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
"Felix Kuehling" <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@mellanox.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox" <mawilcox@microsoft.com>,
"Ross Zwisler" <zwisler@kernel.org>,
"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@kernel.org>,
"Ralph Campbell" <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
"John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: [PATCH v4 8/9] gpu/drm/i915: optimize out the case when a range is updated to read only
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 17:23:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190123222315.1122-9-jglisse@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190123222315.1122-1-jglisse@redhat.com>
From: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
When range of virtual address is updated read only and corresponding
user ptr object are already read only it is pointless to do anything.
Optimize this case out.
Signed-off-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
index 9558582c105e..23330ac3d7ea 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ struct i915_mmu_object {
struct interval_tree_node it;
struct list_head link;
struct work_struct work;
+ bool read_only;
bool attached;
};
@@ -119,6 +120,7 @@ static int i915_gem_userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *_mn,
container_of(_mn, struct i915_mmu_notifier, mn);
struct i915_mmu_object *mo;
struct interval_tree_node *it;
+ bool update_to_read_only;
LIST_HEAD(cancelled);
unsigned long end;
@@ -128,6 +130,8 @@ static int i915_gem_userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *_mn,
/* interval ranges are inclusive, but invalidate range is exclusive */
end = range->end - 1;
+ update_to_read_only = mmu_notifier_range_update_to_read_only(range);
+
spin_lock(&mn->lock);
it = interval_tree_iter_first(&mn->objects, range->start, end);
while (it) {
@@ -145,6 +149,17 @@ static int i915_gem_userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *_mn,
* object if it is not in the process of being destroyed.
*/
mo = container_of(it, struct i915_mmu_object, it);
+
+ /*
+ * If it is already read only and we are updating to
+ * read only then we do not need to change anything.
+ * So save time and skip this one.
+ */
+ if (update_to_read_only && mo->read_only) {
+ it = interval_tree_iter_next(it, range->start, end);
+ continue;
+ }
+
if (kref_get_unless_zero(&mo->obj->base.refcount))
queue_work(mn->wq, &mo->work);
@@ -270,6 +285,7 @@ i915_gem_userptr_init__mmu_notifier(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
mo->mn = mn;
mo->obj = obj;
mo->it.start = obj->userptr.ptr;
+ mo->read_only = i915_gem_object_is_readonly(obj);
mo->it.last = obj->userptr.ptr + obj->base.size - 1;
INIT_WORK(&mo->work, cancel_userptr);
--
2.17.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-23 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-23 22:23 [PATCH v4 0/9] mmu notifier provide context informations jglisse
2019-01-23 22:23 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] mm/mmu_notifier: contextual information for event enums jglisse
2019-01-23 22:23 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] mm/mmu_notifier: contextual information for event triggering invalidation jglisse
2019-01-23 22:23 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] mm/mmu_notifier: use correct mmu_notifier events for each invalidation jglisse
2019-01-23 22:23 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] mm/mmu_notifier: pass down vma and reasons why mmu notifier is happening jglisse
2019-01-23 22:23 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] mm/mmu_notifier: mmu_notifier_range_update_to_read_only() helper jglisse
2019-01-23 22:23 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] gpu/drm/radeon: optimize out the case when a range is updated to read only jglisse
2019-01-23 22:23 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] gpu/drm/amdgpu: " jglisse
2019-01-23 22:23 ` jglisse [this message]
2019-01-24 12:09 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] gpu/drm/i915: " Joonas Lahtinen
2019-01-24 12:09 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2019-01-24 15:30 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-29 14:20 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2019-01-29 16:21 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-23 22:23 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] RDMA/umem_odp: " jglisse
2019-01-23 22:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-23 22:46 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-23 22:54 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] mmu notifier provide context informations Dan Williams
2019-01-23 23:04 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-24 0:00 ` Dan Williams
2019-01-31 16:10 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-31 19:55 ` Andrew Morton
2019-01-31 20:33 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-01 12:24 ` Christian König
2019-02-01 21:02 ` Jan Kara
2019-02-11 18:54 ` Jerome Glisse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190123222315.1122-9-jglisse@redhat.com \
--to=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mawilcox@microsoft.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=zwisler@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).