linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] memory reclaim with NUMA rebalancing
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 11:12:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190130181221.GA19525@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190130174847.GD18811@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 06:48:47PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to propose the following topic for the MM track. Different
> group of people would like to use NVIDMMs as a low cost & slower memory
> which is presented to the system as a NUMA node. We do have a NUMA API
> but it doesn't really fit to "balance the memory between nodes" needs.
> People would like to have hot pages in the regular RAM while cold pages
> might be at lower speed NUMA nodes. We do have NUMA balancing for
> promotion path but there is notIhing for the other direction. Can we
> start considering memory reclaim to move pages to more distant and idle
> NUMA nodes rather than reclaim them? There are certainly details that
> will get quite complicated but I guess it is time to start discussing
> this at least.

Yes, thanks for the proposal. I would be very interested in this
discussion for MM. I think some of the details for determining such a
migration path are related to the heterogeneous memory attributes I'm
currently trying to export.


  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-30 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-30 17:48 [LSF/MM TOPIC] memory reclaim with NUMA rebalancing Michal Hocko
2019-01-30 18:12 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2019-01-30 23:53 ` Yang Shi
2019-01-31  6:49 ` [LSF/MM ATTEND ] " Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-02-06 19:03   ` Christopher Lameter
2019-02-22 13:48     ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-02-22 14:12     ` Larry Woodman
2019-02-23 13:27   ` Fengguang Wu
2019-02-23 13:42     ` Fengguang Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190130181221.GA19525@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).