From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Discuss least bad options for resolving longterm-GUP usage by RDMA
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 10:31:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190206173114.GB12227@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190206095000.GA12006@quack2.suse.cz>
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 10:50:00AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> MM/FS asks for lease to be revoked. The revoke handler agrees with the
> other side on cancelling RDMA or whatever and drops the page pins.
This takes a trip through userspace since the communication protocol
is entirely managed in userspace.
Most existing communication protocols don't have a 'cancel operation'.
> Now I understand there can be HW / communication failures etc. in
> which case the driver could either block waiting or make sure future
> IO will fail and drop the pins.
We can always rip things away from the userspace.. However..
> But under normal conditions there should be a way to revoke the
> access. And if the HW/driver cannot support this, then don't let it
> anywhere near DAX filesystem.
I think the general observation is that people who want to do DAX &
RDMA want it to actually work, without data corruption, random process
kills or random communication failures.
Really, few users would actually want to run in a system where revoke
can be triggered.
So.. how can the FS/MM side provide a guarantee to the user that
revoke won't happen under a certain system design?
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-06 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 106+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-05 17:50 [LSF/MM TOPIC] Discuss least bad options for resolving longterm-GUP usage by RDMA Ira Weiny
2019-02-05 18:01 ` Ira Weiny
2019-02-06 21:31 ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-06 9:50 ` Jan Kara
2019-02-06 17:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-02-06 17:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-06 18:32 ` Doug Ledford
2019-02-06 18:35 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-06 18:44 ` Doug Ledford
2019-02-06 18:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-06 19:45 ` Dan Williams
2019-02-06 20:14 ` Doug Ledford
2019-02-06 21:04 ` Dan Williams
2019-02-06 21:12 ` Doug Ledford
2019-02-06 19:16 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-02-06 19:40 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-06 20:16 ` Doug Ledford
2019-02-06 20:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-06 20:28 ` Doug Ledford
2019-02-06 20:41 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-06 20:47 ` Doug Ledford
2019-02-06 20:49 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-06 20:50 ` Doug Ledford
2019-02-06 20:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-06 20:39 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-02-06 20:54 ` Doug Ledford
2019-02-07 16:48 ` Jan Kara
2019-02-06 20:24 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-02-06 21:03 ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-06 22:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-06 22:24 ` Doug Ledford
2019-02-06 22:44 ` Dan Williams
2019-02-06 23:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-06 23:30 ` Dan Williams
2019-02-06 23:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-07 0:22 ` Dan Williams
2019-02-07 5:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-07 1:57 ` Doug Ledford
2019-02-07 2:48 ` Dan Williams
2019-02-07 2:42 ` Doug Ledford
2019-02-07 3:13 ` Dan Williams
2019-02-07 17:23 ` Ira Weiny
2019-02-07 16:25 ` Doug Ledford
2019-02-07 16:55 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-02-07 17:35 ` Ira Weiny
2019-02-07 18:17 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-02-08 4:43 ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-08 11:10 ` Jan Kara
2019-02-08 20:50 ` Dan Williams
2019-02-11 10:24 ` Jan Kara
2019-02-11 17:22 ` Dan Williams
2019-02-11 18:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-11 18:15 ` Dan Williams
2019-02-11 18:19 ` Ira Weiny
2019-02-11 18:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-11 18:40 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-11 19:58 ` Dan Williams
2019-02-11 20:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-11 21:02 ` Dan Williams
2019-02-11 21:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-12 16:34 ` Jan Kara
2019-02-12 16:55 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-02-13 15:06 ` Jan Kara
2019-02-12 16:36 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-02-12 16:44 ` Jan Kara
2019-02-11 21:08 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-11 21:22 ` John Hubbard
2019-02-11 22:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-11 22:33 ` John Hubbard
2019-02-12 16:39 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-02-13 2:58 ` John Hubbard
2019-02-12 16:28 ` Jan Kara
2019-02-14 20:26 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-14 20:50 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-14 21:39 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-15 1:19 ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-15 15:42 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-02-15 18:08 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-15 18:31 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-02-15 22:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-15 23:38 ` Ira Weiny
2019-02-16 22:42 ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-17 2:54 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-02-12 16:07 ` Jan Kara
2019-02-12 21:53 ` Dan Williams
2019-02-08 21:20 ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-08 15:33 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-02-07 17:24 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-07 17:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-07 3:52 ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-07 5:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-07 6:00 ` Dan Williams
2019-02-07 17:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-07 23:54 ` Dan Williams
2019-02-08 1:44 ` Ira Weiny
2019-02-08 5:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-08 7:20 ` Dan Williams
2019-02-08 15:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-07 15:04 ` Chuck Lever
2019-02-07 15:28 ` Tom Talpey
2019-02-07 15:37 ` Doug Ledford
2019-02-07 15:41 ` Tom Talpey
2019-02-07 15:56 ` Doug Ledford
2019-02-07 16:57 ` Ira Weiny
2019-02-07 21:31 ` Tom Talpey
2019-02-07 16:54 ` Ira Weiny
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190206173114.GB12227@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).