From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 304F6C10F05 for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 06:28:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D74EC2186A for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 06:28:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Hy2IuyxD" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D74EC2186A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 52FDA6B0003; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 02:28:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 4DE696B0006; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 02:28:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 3CDC06B0007; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 02:28:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from mail-pf1-f198.google.com (mail-pf1-f198.google.com [209.85.210.198]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E096B0003 for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 02:28:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pf1-f198.google.com with SMTP id c15so1553695pfn.11 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 23:28:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:dkim-signature:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=LbIl5miV1UQk/NYOoLkhOwmfUEF1As80uuyi+JvPxtE=; b=ildNCgGMuhbc/4PQHDkfmm6S/1eq0JC48sFkG/zN8iUot1Lf01rOXSoK2w6NTmRosM UF/oi8MUgi0pH+90W9PDiDotcLrQ5UbyeyMkHhus+BAIkZK5/oVmQOlLidzXujxCyYhY xIRm0htuRI0GnF6tUPPtv4Qnstsk2Jokfp/vRwYIjWlbvbaOZWu+0DepqaH06hV03egR x+Fl0SJ/0IoWgf2PjBepS4J1YK9zHPFdXD9bjViwDzixuY26+qTOELVqsL4jRq8G05NZ fpa3j3Q5b9NlunglOsohN9qGQUPna8EyElBGIpqZhVa1X+yaagTvGu+xAVDQG21wDuB3 HS9A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXdi9EvgzKzDmdyTDjkRaQY6oUR13wjZAdmPbHblMnHPSWbEKv5 KuS2SE2CMMjL6KfQ/tpB25iLh5cZdKerUWLNwrK6Y7G5BwWUmLkhBlcFrPT1kfqTny+6ad0JY/2 gLptvVOfgM3oxwNbMAnuO1rqSRHGK1s3pJYPLCOB4UeEvENiP0wZgCWksQRugYiSVig== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9a5:: with SMTP id 34mr6293010pln.287.1553063308644; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 23:28:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwm0CA4U+xoEDzOs8YKWJq9yP5b3YkiV8LQhfao3vFV5fQ1M9CzzuvjOccTliHlfo5juSk5 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9a5:: with SMTP id 34mr6292944pln.287.1553063307655; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 23:28:27 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1553063307; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=m7VeHPlwXwIljGrjPtw+gk/Y/9PYbLua0mz2WKfYOjGP2m8L4162uI+j11zHaov7Lo FLeFHeDybeBVUujH/kmKlonpn39myWIS5JkB4G+W+OYuGQSj9CCzAQKMYxDdKCTwpt2n laCt3OJX2xK20ORiSlj8LKlkc2PhGJzzysxOq1cLIJSXm9bjSYXvHfOT2GgUZbQVLBz5 l3UVWZlwU7xKfkEEiSQgj90SkOylOUudMdDz42JfDxnjV3FMrI4B5VY6uOHoPUVI9qHr vlG4WlVhBwYZtlhONtvc2Gm+vTu6ya371dxjXdfBR6tmUKnRJUS8az2ZJtocqLe6Qbz0 ysJw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=LbIl5miV1UQk/NYOoLkhOwmfUEF1As80uuyi+JvPxtE=; b=NDjLIiJXsE7fVtdEQkEbPdgo+v06DheLllqm5ZNzx4I6R/3AnXVEHwTvgWw75Cj3UR vsIqSdXQohQi1LevUejIXfVt7s1lAtE8Q6paQL9BynSVAkCWlrJM+c6z245p/vUu8FtW A81kAZJozVbO1tMl9HQaYrBYyFYneLafUJfnnqoCgB9cpDIVp5IFQAP8BhNiVlPVDAD3 zevFLOfHDbdsVT+Hk2bJoIeVuD+aaKHcYfZzdPAwmZ7HvruYcArS1rUWYhwnSeDWbz2s rP6AW7ycH2VI0qveF98iiCqQgXLY7mgaxbnzciVekAgvDXcKIRmHCDzVUKjC414qGe5Q KRew== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=Hy2IuyxD; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gregkh@linuxfoundation.org designates 198.145.29.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org. [198.145.29.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 42si1155886pld.383.2019.03.19.23.28.27 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Mar 2019 23:28:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gregkh@linuxfoundation.org designates 198.145.29.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=198.145.29.99; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=Hy2IuyxD; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gregkh@linuxfoundation.org designates 198.145.29.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CAD752184E; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 06:28:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1553063307; bh=q6Tl8p2X/rd5nPI6ZuGwZIG2VMWqvkZUQ3AmxOiHGqs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Hy2IuyxDTqyNO86MzHtCQRsYBqm+0SqWn1v35q0bJnaub/HMuIapUVQj9mhSDtyRp O4yuN4G37XsHqbIcV6f+bUa20jPHvgnOqxjSfpbZI3UAaAY3fliJ/2gnTu7/5DRz3I +cX44XzmOP4hxx4xtsOzOwT0U0FeKzIDTxpDQcJw= Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 07:28:24 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Jon Masters Cc: Sasha Levin , Amir Goldstein , Steve French , lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel , linux-mm , LKML , "Luis R. Rodriguez" Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] FS, MM, and stable trees Message-ID: <20190320062824.GA11080@kroah.com> References: <20190213073707.GA2875@kroah.com> <20190213091803.GA2308@kroah.com> <20190213192512.GH69686@sasha-vm> <20190213195232.GA10047@kroah.com> <79d10599-70d2-7d06-1cee-6e52d36233bf@jonmasters.org> <20190320050659.GA16580@kroah.com> <134e0fe1-e468-5243-90b5-ccb81d63e9a1@jonmasters.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <134e0fe1-e468-5243-90b5-ccb81d63e9a1@jonmasters.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 02:14:09AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > On 3/20/19 1:06 AM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 11:46:09PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > >> On 2/13/19 2:52 PM, Greg KH wrote: > >>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 02:25:12PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote: > >> > >>>> So really, it sounds like a low hanging fruit: we don't really need to > >>>> write much more testing code code nor do we have to refactor existing > >>>> test suites. We just need to make sure the right tests are running on > >>>> stable kernels. I really want to clarify what each subsystem sees as > >>>> "sufficient" (and have that documented somewhere). > >>> > >>> kernel.ci and 0-day and Linaro are starting to add the fs and mm tests > >>> to their test suites to address these issues (I think 0-day already has > >>> many of them). So this is happening, but not quite obvious. I know I > >>> keep asking Linaro about this :( > >> > >> We're working on investments for LDCG[0] in 2019 that include kernel CI > >> changes for server use cases. Please keep us informed of what you folks > >> ultimately want to see, and I'll pass on to the steering committee too. > >> > >> Ultimately I've been pushing for a kernel 0-day project for Arm. That's > >> probably going to require a lot of duplicated effort since the original > >> 0-day project isn't open, but creating an open one could help everyone. > > > > Why are you trying to duplicate it on your own? That's what kernel.ci > > should be doing, please join in and invest in that instead. It's an > > open source project with its own governance and needs sponsors, why > > waste time and money doing it all on your own? > > To clarify, I'm pushing for investment in kernel.ci to achieve that goal > that it could provide the same 0-day capability for Arm and others. Great, that's what I was trying to suggest :) > It'll ultimately result in duplicated effort vs if 0-day were open. "Half" of 0-day is open, but it's that other half that is still needed... thanks, greg k-h