From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm:workingset use real time to judge activity of the file page
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 20:24:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190405032401.GN22763@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1554348617-12897-1-git-send-email-huangzhaoyang@gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 11:30:17AM +0800, Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
> +++ b/mm/workingset.c
> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@
> NODES_SHIFT + \
> MEM_CGROUP_ID_SHIFT)
> #define EVICTION_MASK (~0UL >> EVICTION_SHIFT)
> -
> +#define EVICTION_JIFFIES (BITS_PER_LONG >> 3)
> /*
> * Eviction timestamps need to be able to cover the full range of
> * actionable refaults. However, bits are tight in the radix tree
> @@ -175,18 +175,22 @@ static void *pack_shadow(int memcgid, pg_data_t *pgdat, unsigned long eviction)
> eviction >>= bucket_order;
> eviction = (eviction << MEM_CGROUP_ID_SHIFT) | memcgid;
> eviction = (eviction << NODES_SHIFT) | pgdat->node_id;
> + eviction = (eviction << EVICTION_JIFFIES) | (jiffies >> EVICTION_JIFFIES);
> eviction = (eviction << RADIX_TREE_EXCEPTIONAL_SHIFT);
... this isn't against current, or even 5.0.
> entry >>= RADIX_TREE_EXCEPTIONAL_SHIFT;
> + entry >>= EVICTION_JIFFIES;
> + prev_jiff = (entry & ((1UL << EVICTION_JIFFIES) - 1)) << EVICTION_JIFFIES;
These two lines are in the wrong order. So you're getting (effectively) a
random answer in your 'prev_jiff', which means your testing isn't thorough
enough. I suspect you're only testing cases you're expecting to improve,
and you aren't testing to make sure that other cases don't regress.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-05 3:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-04 3:30 [PATCH] mm:workingset use real time to judge activity of the file page Zhaoyang Huang
2019-04-04 7:15 ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-05 3:13 ` Zhaoyang Huang
2019-04-04 16:39 ` Johannes Weiner
2019-04-04 23:23 ` Zhaoyang Huang
2019-04-05 19:34 ` Johannes Weiner
2019-04-05 3:24 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-04-04 2:01 Zhaoyang Huang
2019-04-07 0:43 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190405032401.GN22763@bombadil.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=huangzhaoyang@gmail.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mawilcox@microsoft.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).