From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com, mhocko@suse.com,
dave.jiang@intel.com, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
willy@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org,
yi.z.zhang@linux.intel.com, khalid.aziz@oracle.com,
rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
davem@davemloft.net, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Subject: [mm PATCH v7 0/4] Deferred page init improvements
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 15:12:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190405221043.12227.19679.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
This patchset is essentially a refactor of the page initialization logic
that is meant to provide for better code reuse while providing a
significant improvement in deferred page initialization performance.
In my testing on an x86_64 system with 384GB of RAM I have seen the
following. In the case of regular memory initialization the deferred init
time was decreased from 3.75s to 1.38s on average. This amounts to a 172%
improvement for the deferred memory initialization performance.
I have called out the improvement observed with each patch.
v1->v2:
Fixed build issue on PowerPC due to page struct size being 56
Added new patch that removed __SetPageReserved call for hotplug
v2->v3:
Rebased on latest linux-next
Removed patch that had removed __SetPageReserved call from init
Added patch that folded __SetPageReserved into set_page_links
Tweaked __init_pageblock to use start_pfn to get section_nr instead of pfn
v3->v4:
Updated patch description and comments for mm_zero_struct_page patch
Replaced "default" with "case 64"
Removed #ifndef mm_zero_struct_page
Fixed typo in comment that ommited "_from" in kerneldoc for iterator
Added Reviewed-by for patches reviewed by Pavel
Added Acked-by from Michal Hocko
Added deferred init times for patches that affect init performance
Swapped patches 5 & 6, pulled some code/comments from 4 into 5
v4->v5:
Updated Acks/Reviewed-by
Rebased on latest linux-next
Split core bits of zone iterator patch from MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES init
v5->v6:
Rebased on linux-next with previous v5 reverted
Drop the "This patch" or "This change" from patch descriptions.
Cleaned up patch descriptions for patches 3 & 4
Fixed kerneldoc for __next_mem_pfn_range_in_zone
Updated several Reviewed-by, and incorporated suggestions from Pavel
Added __init_single_page_nolru to patch 5 to consolidate code
Refactored iterator in patch 7 and fixed several issues
v6->v7:
Updated MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES patch to stop on section aligned boundaries
Dropped patches 5-7
Will follow-up later with reserved bit rework before resubmitting
---
Alexander Duyck (4):
mm: Use mm_zero_struct_page from SPARC on all 64b architectures
mm: Drop meminit_pfn_in_nid as it is redundant
mm: Implement new zone specific memblock iterator
mm: Initialize MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES at a time instead of doing larger sections
arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable_64.h | 30 -----
include/linux/memblock.h | 41 +++++++
include/linux/mm.h | 41 ++++++-
mm/memblock.c | 64 ++++++++++
mm/page_alloc.c | 218 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
5 files changed, 277 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)
--
next reply other threads:[~2019-04-05 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-05 22:12 Alexander Duyck [this message]
2019-04-05 22:12 ` [mm PATCH v7 1/4] mm: Use mm_zero_struct_page from SPARC on all 64b architectures Alexander Duyck
2019-04-05 22:12 ` [mm PATCH v7 2/4] mm: Drop meminit_pfn_in_nid as it is redundant Alexander Duyck
2019-04-05 22:12 ` [mm PATCH v7 3/4] mm: Implement new zone specific memblock iterator Alexander Duyck
2019-04-06 13:02 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-04-05 22:12 ` [mm PATCH v7 4/4] mm: Initialize MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES at a time instead of doing larger sections Alexander Duyck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190405221043.12227.19679.stgit@localhost.localdomain \
--to=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=khalid.aziz@oracle.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yi.z.zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).