* [linux-stable-rc:linux-5.0.y 1434/2350] arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh2/clock-sh7619.o:undefined reference to `followparent_recalc'
@ 2019-05-30 7:31 kbuild test robot
2019-05-30 14:43 ` Randy Dunlap
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2019-05-30 7:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Randy Dunlap
Cc: kbuild-all, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Andrew Morton,
Linux Memory Management List, Sasha Levin (Microsoft)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1114 bytes --]
Hi Randy,
It's probably a bug fix that unveils the link errors.
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.0.y
head: 8c963c3dcbdec7b2a1fd90044f23bc8124848381
commit: b174065805b55300d9d4e6ae6865c7b0838cc0f4 [1434/2350] sh: fix multiple function definition build errors
config: sh-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: sh4-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.4.0
reproduce:
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
git checkout b174065805b55300d9d4e6ae6865c7b0838cc0f4
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
GCC_VERSION=7.4.0 make.cross ARCH=sh
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh2/clock-sh7619.o:(.data+0x1c): undefined reference to `followparent_recalc'
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 50446 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [linux-stable-rc:linux-5.0.y 1434/2350] arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh2/clock-sh7619.o:undefined reference to `followparent_recalc' 2019-05-30 7:31 [linux-stable-rc:linux-5.0.y 1434/2350] arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh2/clock-sh7619.o:undefined reference to `followparent_recalc' kbuild test robot @ 2019-05-30 14:43 ` Randy Dunlap 2019-05-31 0:00 ` Stephen Rothwell 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Randy Dunlap @ 2019-05-30 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kbuild test robot Cc: kbuild-all, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Andrew Morton, Linux Memory Management List, Sasha Levin (Microsoft), Stephen Rothwell, Yoshinori Sato, Rich Felker, linux-sh On 5/30/19 12:31 AM, kbuild test robot wrote: > Hi Randy, > > It's probably a bug fix that unveils the link errors. > > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.0.y > head: 8c963c3dcbdec7b2a1fd90044f23bc8124848381 > commit: b174065805b55300d9d4e6ae6865c7b0838cc0f4 [1434/2350] sh: fix multiple function definition build errors > config: sh-allmodconfig (attached as .config) > compiler: sh4-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.4.0 > reproduce: > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > git checkout b174065805b55300d9d4e6ae6865c7b0838cc0f4 > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > GCC_VERSION=7.4.0 make.cross ARCH=sh > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > >>> arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh2/clock-sh7619.o:(.data+0x1c): undefined reference to `followparent_recalc' > > --- > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation The maintainer posted a patch for this but AFAIK it is not merged anywhere. https://marc.info/?l=linux-sh&m=155585522728632&w=2 -- ~Randy ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-stable-rc:linux-5.0.y 1434/2350] arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh2/clock-sh7619.o:undefined reference to `followparent_recalc' 2019-05-30 14:43 ` Randy Dunlap @ 2019-05-31 0:00 ` Stephen Rothwell 2019-06-02 7:13 ` Yoshinori Sato 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2019-05-31 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Randy Dunlap Cc: kbuild test robot, kbuild-all, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Andrew Morton, Linux Memory Management List, Sasha Levin (Microsoft), Yoshinori Sato, Rich Felker, linux-sh [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3665 bytes --] Hi all, On Thu, 30 May 2019 07:43:10 -0700 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote: > > On 5/30/19 12:31 AM, kbuild test robot wrote: > > Hi Randy, > > > > It's probably a bug fix that unveils the link errors. > > > > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.0.y > > head: 8c963c3dcbdec7b2a1fd90044f23bc8124848381 > > commit: b174065805b55300d9d4e6ae6865c7b0838cc0f4 [1434/2350] sh: fix multiple function definition build errors > > config: sh-allmodconfig (attached as .config) > > compiler: sh4-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.4.0 > > reproduce: > > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > > git checkout b174065805b55300d9d4e6ae6865c7b0838cc0f4 > > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > > GCC_VERSION=7.4.0 make.cross ARCH=sh > > > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag > > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > >>> arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh2/clock-sh7619.o:(.data+0x1c): undefined reference to `followparent_recalc' > > > > --- > > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center > > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation > > > The maintainer posted a patch for this but AFAIK it is not merged anywhere. > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-sh&m=155585522728632&w=2 Unfortunately, the sh tree (git://git.libc.org/linux-sh#for-next) has been removed from linux-next due to lack of any updates in over a year, but I will add that patch (see below) to linux-next today, but someone will need to make sure it gets to Linus at some point (preferably sooner rather than later). (I can send it if someone associated with the sh development wants/asks me to ...) From: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 14:00:16 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] sh: Fix allyesconfig output Conflict JCore-SoC and SolutionEngine 7619. Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> # build-tested Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> --- arch/sh/boards/Kconfig | 14 +++----------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/sh/boards/Kconfig b/arch/sh/boards/Kconfig index b9a37057b77a..cee24c308337 100644 --- a/arch/sh/boards/Kconfig +++ b/arch/sh/boards/Kconfig @@ -8,27 +8,19 @@ config SH_ALPHA_BOARD bool config SH_DEVICE_TREE - bool "Board Described by Device Tree" + bool select OF select OF_EARLY_FLATTREE select TIMER_OF select COMMON_CLK select GENERIC_CALIBRATE_DELAY - help - Select Board Described by Device Tree to build a kernel that - does not hard-code any board-specific knowledge but instead uses - a device tree blob provided by the boot-loader. You must enable - drivers for any hardware you want to use separately. At this - time, only boards based on the open-hardware J-Core processors - have sufficient driver coverage to use this option; do not - select it if you are using original SuperH hardware. config SH_JCORE_SOC bool "J-Core SoC" - depends on SH_DEVICE_TREE && (CPU_SH2 || CPU_J2) + select SH_DEVICE_TREE select CLKSRC_JCORE_PIT select JCORE_AIC - default y if CPU_J2 + depends on CPU_J2 help Select this option to include drivers core components of the J-Core SoC, including interrupt controllers and timers. -- 2.11.0 -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-stable-rc:linux-5.0.y 1434/2350] arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh2/clock-sh7619.o:undefined reference to `followparent_recalc' 2019-05-31 0:00 ` Stephen Rothwell @ 2019-06-02 7:13 ` Yoshinori Sato 2019-06-02 7:43 ` Stephen Rothwell 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Yoshinori Sato @ 2019-06-02 7:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Randy Dunlap, kbuild test robot, kbuild-all, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Andrew Morton, Linux Memory Management List, Sasha Levin (Microsoft), Rich Felker, linux-sh On Fri, 31 May 2019 09:00:04 +0900, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > [1 <text/plain; US-ASCII (quoted-printable)>] > Hi all, > > On Thu, 30 May 2019 07:43:10 -0700 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote: > > > > On 5/30/19 12:31 AM, kbuild test robot wrote: > > > Hi Randy, > > > > > > It's probably a bug fix that unveils the link errors. > > > > > > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.0.y > > > head: 8c963c3dcbdec7b2a1fd90044f23bc8124848381 > > > commit: b174065805b55300d9d4e6ae6865c7b0838cc0f4 [1434/2350] sh: fix multiple function definition build errors > > > config: sh-allmodconfig (attached as .config) > > > compiler: sh4-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.4.0 > > > reproduce: > > > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > > > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > > > git checkout b174065805b55300d9d4e6ae6865c7b0838cc0f4 > > > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > > > GCC_VERSION=7.4.0 make.cross ARCH=sh > > > > > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag > > > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > > > > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > > >>> arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh2/clock-sh7619.o:(.data+0x1c): undefined reference to `followparent_recalc' > > > > > > --- > > > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center > > > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation > > > > > > The maintainer posted a patch for this but AFAIK it is not merged anywhere. > > > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-sh&m=155585522728632&w=2 > > Unfortunately, the sh tree (git://git.libc.org/linux-sh#for-next) has > been removed from linux-next due to lack of any updates in over a year, > but I will add that patch (see below) to linux-next today, but someone > will need to make sure it gets to Linus at some point (preferably > sooner rather than later). (I can send it if someone associated with > the sh development wants/asks me to ...) OK. Since I created a temporary sh-next, please get it here. git://git.sourceforge.jp/gitroot/uclinux-h8/linux.git tags/sh-next It same host of h8300-next. > From: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> > Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 14:00:16 +0000 > Subject: [PATCH] sh: Fix allyesconfig output > > Conflict JCore-SoC and SolutionEngine 7619. > > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> > Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> # build-tested > Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> > --- > arch/sh/boards/Kconfig | 14 +++----------- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/sh/boards/Kconfig b/arch/sh/boards/Kconfig > index b9a37057b77a..cee24c308337 100644 > --- a/arch/sh/boards/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/sh/boards/Kconfig > @@ -8,27 +8,19 @@ config SH_ALPHA_BOARD > bool > > config SH_DEVICE_TREE > - bool "Board Described by Device Tree" > + bool > select OF > select OF_EARLY_FLATTREE > select TIMER_OF > select COMMON_CLK > select GENERIC_CALIBRATE_DELAY > - help > - Select Board Described by Device Tree to build a kernel that > - does not hard-code any board-specific knowledge but instead uses > - a device tree blob provided by the boot-loader. You must enable > - drivers for any hardware you want to use separately. At this > - time, only boards based on the open-hardware J-Core processors > - have sufficient driver coverage to use this option; do not > - select it if you are using original SuperH hardware. > > config SH_JCORE_SOC > bool "J-Core SoC" > - depends on SH_DEVICE_TREE && (CPU_SH2 || CPU_J2) > + select SH_DEVICE_TREE > select CLKSRC_JCORE_PIT > select JCORE_AIC > - default y if CPU_J2 > + depends on CPU_J2 > help > Select this option to include drivers core components of the > J-Core SoC, including interrupt controllers and timers. > -- > 2.11.0 > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell > [2 OpenPGP digital signature <application/pgp-signature (7bit)>] > No public key for 015042F34957D06C created at 2019-05-31T09:00:04+0900 using RSA -- Yosinori Sato ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-stable-rc:linux-5.0.y 1434/2350] arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh2/clock-sh7619.o:undefined reference to `followparent_recalc' 2019-06-02 7:13 ` Yoshinori Sato @ 2019-06-02 7:43 ` Stephen Rothwell 2019-06-02 11:29 ` Yoshinori Sato 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2019-06-02 7:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yoshinori Sato Cc: Randy Dunlap, kbuild test robot, kbuild-all, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Andrew Morton, Linux Memory Management List, Sasha Levin (Microsoft), Rich Felker, linux-sh [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1291 bytes --] Hi Yoshinori, On Sun, 02 Jun 2019 16:13:04 +0900 Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> wrote: > > Since I created a temporary sh-next, please get it here. > git://git.sourceforge.jp/gitroot/uclinux-h8/linux.git tags/sh-next I have added that tree to linux-next from tomorrow. However, thet is no sh-next tag in that tree, so I used the sh-next branch. I don't think you need the back merge of Linus' tree. Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next. As you may know, this is not a judgement of your code. The purpose of linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window. You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have been: * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's Signed-off-by, * posted to the relevant mailing list, * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree), * successfully unit tested, and * destined for the current or next Linux merge window. Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him to fetch). It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-stable-rc:linux-5.0.y 1434/2350] arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh2/clock-sh7619.o:undefined reference to `followparent_recalc' 2019-06-02 7:43 ` Stephen Rothwell @ 2019-06-02 11:29 ` Yoshinori Sato 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Yoshinori Sato @ 2019-06-02 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Randy Dunlap, kbuild test robot, kbuild-all, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Andrew Morton, Linux Memory Management List, Sasha Levin (Microsoft), Rich Felker, linux-sh On Sun, 02 Jun 2019 16:43:14 +0900, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > [1 <text/plain; US-ASCII (quoted-printable)>] > Hi Yoshinori, > > On Sun, 02 Jun 2019 16:13:04 +0900 Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> wrote: > > > > Since I created a temporary sh-next, please get it here. > > git://git.sourceforge.jp/gitroot/uclinux-h8/linux.git tags/sh-next > > I have added that tree to linux-next from tomorrow. However, thet is > no sh-next tag in that tree, so I used the sh-next branch. I don't > think you need the back merge of Linus' tree. Oh sorry. I created sh-next branch in this git repository. > Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next. As > you may know, this is not a judgement of your code. The purpose of > linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of > conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window. > > You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have > been: > * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's > Signed-off-by, > * posted to the relevant mailing list, > * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree), > * successfully unit tested, and > * destined for the current or next Linux merge window. > > Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him > to fetch). It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary. > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell > sfr@canb.auug.org.au > [2 OpenPGP digital signature <application/pgp-signature (7bit)>] > No public key for 015042F34957D06C created at 2019-06-02T16:43:14+0900 using RSA -- Yosinori Sato ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-06-02 11:29 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2019-05-30 7:31 [linux-stable-rc:linux-5.0.y 1434/2350] arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh2/clock-sh7619.o:undefined reference to `followparent_recalc' kbuild test robot 2019-05-30 14:43 ` Randy Dunlap 2019-05-31 0:00 ` Stephen Rothwell 2019-06-02 7:13 ` Yoshinori Sato 2019-06-02 7:43 ` Stephen Rothwell 2019-06-02 11:29 ` Yoshinori Sato
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).