linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
	Felix.Kuehling@amd.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 hmm 08/11] mm/hmm: Remove racy protection against double-unregistration
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2019 10:57:53 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190607135753.GH14802@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <88400de9-e1ae-509b-718f-c6b0f726b14c@nvidia.com>

On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 08:29:10PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> On 6/6/19 11:44 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
> > 
> > No other register/unregister kernel API attempts to provide this kind of
> > protection as it is inherently racy, so just drop it.
> > 
> > Callers should provide their own protection, it appears nouveau already
> > does, but just in case drop a debugging POISON.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> >  mm/hmm.c | 9 ++-------
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
> > index c702cd72651b53..6802de7080d172 100644
> > +++ b/mm/hmm.c
> > @@ -284,18 +284,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(hmm_mirror_register);
> >   */
> >  void hmm_mirror_unregister(struct hmm_mirror *mirror)
> >  {
> > -	struct hmm *hmm = READ_ONCE(mirror->hmm);
> > -
> > -	if (hmm == NULL)
> > -		return;
> > +	struct hmm *hmm = mirror->hmm;
> >  
> >  	down_write(&hmm->mirrors_sem);
> >  	list_del_init(&mirror->list);
> > -	/* To protect us against double unregister ... */
> > -	mirror->hmm = NULL;
> >  	up_write(&hmm->mirrors_sem);
> > -
> >  	hmm_put(hmm);
> > +	memset(&mirror->hmm, POISON_INUSE, sizeof(mirror->hmm));
> 
> I hadn't thought of POISON_* for these types of cases, it's a 
> good technique to remember.
> 
> I noticed that this is now done outside of the lock, but that
> follows directly from your commit description, so that all looks 
> correct.

Yes, the thing about POISON is that if you ever read it then you have
found a use after free bug - thus we should never need to write it
under a lock (just after a serializing lock)

Normally I wouldn't bother as kfree does poison as well, but since we
can't easily audit the patches yet to be submitted this seems safer
and will reliably cause those patches to explode with an oops in
testing.

Thanks,
Jason


  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-07 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-06 18:44 [PATCH v2 hmm 00/11] Various revisions from a locking/code review Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-06 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 hmm 01/11] mm/hmm: fix use after free with struct hmm in the mmu notifiers Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-07  2:29   ` John Hubbard
2019-06-07 12:34     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-07 13:42       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-08  1:13       ` John Hubbard
2019-06-08  1:37       ` John Hubbard
2019-06-07 18:12   ` Ralph Campbell
2019-06-08  8:49   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-08 11:33     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-06 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 hmm 02/11] mm/hmm: Use hmm_mirror not mm as an argument for hmm_range_register Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-07  2:36   ` John Hubbard
2019-06-07 18:24   ` Ralph Campbell
2019-06-07 22:39     ` Ralph Campbell
2019-06-10 13:09       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-07 22:33   ` Ira Weiny
2019-06-08  8:54   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11 19:44     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-12  7:12       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-12 11:41         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-12 12:11           ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-06 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 hmm 03/11] mm/hmm: Hold a mmgrab from hmm to mm Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-07  2:44   ` John Hubbard
2019-06-07 12:36     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-07 18:41   ` Ralph Campbell
2019-06-07 18:51     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-07 22:38   ` Ira Weiny
2019-06-06 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 hmm 04/11] mm/hmm: Simplify hmm_get_or_create and make it reliable Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-07  2:54   ` John Hubbard
2019-06-07 18:52   ` Ralph Campbell
2019-06-07 22:44   ` Ira Weiny
2019-06-06 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 hmm 05/11] mm/hmm: Remove duplicate condition test before wait_event_timeout Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-07  3:06   ` John Hubbard
2019-06-07 12:47     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-07 13:31     ` [PATCH v3 " Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-07 22:55       ` Ira Weiny
2019-06-08  1:32       ` John Hubbard
2019-06-07 19:01   ` [PATCH v2 " Ralph Campbell
2019-06-07 19:13     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-07 20:21       ` Ralph Campbell
2019-06-07 20:44         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-07 22:13           ` Ralph Campbell
2019-06-08  1:47             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-06 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 hmm 06/11] mm/hmm: Hold on to the mmget for the lifetime of the range Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-07  3:15   ` John Hubbard
2019-06-07 20:29   ` Ralph Campbell
2019-06-06 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 hmm 07/11] mm/hmm: Use lockdep instead of comments Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-07  3:19   ` John Hubbard
2019-06-07 20:31   ` Ralph Campbell
2019-06-07 22:16   ` Souptick Joarder
2019-06-06 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 hmm 08/11] mm/hmm: Remove racy protection against double-unregistration Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-07  3:29   ` John Hubbard
2019-06-07 13:57     ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-06-07 20:33   ` Ralph Campbell
2019-06-06 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 hmm 09/11] mm/hmm: Poison hmm_range during unregister Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-07  3:37   ` John Hubbard
2019-06-07 14:03     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-07 20:46   ` Ralph Campbell
2019-06-07 20:49     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-07 23:01   ` Ira Weiny
2019-06-06 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 hmm 10/11] mm/hmm: Do not use list*_rcu() for hmm->ranges Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-07  3:40   ` John Hubbard
2019-06-07 20:49   ` Ralph Campbell
2019-06-07 22:11   ` Souptick Joarder
2019-06-07 23:02   ` Ira Weiny
2019-06-06 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 hmm 11/11] mm/hmm: Remove confusing comment and logic from hmm_release Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-07  3:47   ` John Hubbard
2019-06-07 12:58     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-07 21:37   ` Ralph Campbell
2019-06-08  2:12     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-10 16:02     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-10 22:03       ` Ralph Campbell
2019-06-07 16:05 ` [PATCH v2 12/11] mm/hmm: Fix error flows in hmm_invalidate_range_start Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-07 23:52   ` Ralph Campbell
2019-06-08  1:35     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-11 19:48 ` [PATCH v2 hmm 00/11] Various revisions from a locking/code review Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-12 17:54   ` Kuehling, Felix
2019-06-12 21:49     ` Yang, Philip
2019-06-13 17:50       ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190607135753.GH14802@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).