From: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
osalvador@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 03/12] mm/hotplug: Prepare shrink_{zone, pgdat}_span for sub-section removal
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 09:42:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190618014223.GD18161@richard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <155977188458.2443951.9573565800736334460.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 02:58:04PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>Sub-section hotplug support reduces the unit of operation of hotplug
>from section-sized-units (PAGES_PER_SECTION) to sub-section-sized units
>(PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION). Teach shrink_{zone,pgdat}_span() to consider
>PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION boundaries as the points where pfn_valid(), not
>valid_section(), can toggle.
>
>Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
>Cc: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
>Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
>Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
>Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>---
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 29 ++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>index 7b963c2d3a0d..647859a1d119 100644
>--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>@@ -318,12 +318,8 @@ static unsigned long find_smallest_section_pfn(int nid, struct zone *zone,
> unsigned long start_pfn,
> unsigned long end_pfn)
> {
>- struct mem_section *ms;
>-
>- for (; start_pfn < end_pfn; start_pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
>- ms = __pfn_to_section(start_pfn);
>-
>- if (unlikely(!valid_section(ms)))
>+ for (; start_pfn < end_pfn; start_pfn += PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION) {
>+ if (unlikely(!pfn_valid(start_pfn)))
> continue;
Hmm, we change the granularity of valid section from SECTION to SUBSECTION.
But we didn't change the granularity of node id and zone information.
For example, we found the node id of a pfn mismatch, we can skip the whole
section instead of a subsection.
Maybe this is not a big deal.
>
> if (unlikely(pfn_to_nid(start_pfn) != nid))
>@@ -343,15 +339,12 @@ static unsigned long find_biggest_section_pfn(int nid, struct zone *zone,
> unsigned long start_pfn,
> unsigned long end_pfn)
> {
>- struct mem_section *ms;
> unsigned long pfn;
>
> /* pfn is the end pfn of a memory section. */
> pfn = end_pfn - 1;
>- for (; pfn >= start_pfn; pfn -= PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
>- ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
>-
>- if (unlikely(!valid_section(ms)))
>+ for (; pfn >= start_pfn; pfn -= PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION) {
>+ if (unlikely(!pfn_valid(pfn)))
> continue;
>
> if (unlikely(pfn_to_nid(pfn) != nid))
>@@ -373,7 +366,6 @@ static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
> unsigned long z = zone_end_pfn(zone); /* zone_end_pfn namespace clash */
> unsigned long zone_end_pfn = z;
> unsigned long pfn;
>- struct mem_section *ms;
> int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
>
> zone_span_writelock(zone);
>@@ -410,10 +402,8 @@ static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
> * it check the zone has only hole or not.
> */
> pfn = zone_start_pfn;
>- for (; pfn < zone_end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
>- ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
>-
>- if (unlikely(!valid_section(ms)))
>+ for (; pfn < zone_end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION) {
>+ if (unlikely(!pfn_valid(pfn)))
> continue;
>
> if (page_zone(pfn_to_page(pfn)) != zone)
>@@ -441,7 +431,6 @@ static void shrink_pgdat_span(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
> unsigned long p = pgdat_end_pfn(pgdat); /* pgdat_end_pfn namespace clash */
> unsigned long pgdat_end_pfn = p;
> unsigned long pfn;
>- struct mem_section *ms;
> int nid = pgdat->node_id;
>
> if (pgdat_start_pfn == start_pfn) {
>@@ -478,10 +467,8 @@ static void shrink_pgdat_span(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
> * has only hole or not.
> */
> pfn = pgdat_start_pfn;
>- for (; pfn < pgdat_end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
>- ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
>-
>- if (unlikely(!valid_section(ms)))
>+ for (; pfn < pgdat_end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION) {
>+ if (unlikely(!pfn_valid(pfn)))
> continue;
>
> if (pfn_to_nid(pfn) != nid)
>
>_______________________________________________
>Linux-nvdimm mailing list
>Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
>https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-18 1:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-05 21:57 [PATCH v9 00/12] mm: Sub-section memory hotplug support Dan Williams
2019-06-05 21:57 ` [PATCH v9 01/12] mm/sparsemem: Introduce struct mem_section_usage Dan Williams
2019-06-06 17:34 ` Oscar Salvador
2019-06-16 13:11 ` Wei Yang
2019-06-18 21:56 ` Dan Williams
2019-06-19 2:13 ` Wei Yang
2019-06-05 21:57 ` [PATCH v9 02/12] mm/sparsemem: Add helpers track active portions of a section at boot Dan Williams
2019-06-06 16:55 ` Oscar Salvador
2019-06-17 22:21 ` Wei Yang
2019-06-17 22:32 ` Dan Williams
2019-06-18 1:03 ` Wei Yang
2019-06-19 3:15 ` Dan Williams
2019-06-05 21:58 ` [PATCH v9 03/12] mm/hotplug: Prepare shrink_{zone, pgdat}_span for sub-section removal Dan Williams
2019-06-18 1:42 ` Wei Yang [this message]
2019-06-19 3:40 ` Dan Williams
2019-06-05 21:58 ` [PATCH v9 04/12] mm/sparsemem: Convert kmalloc_section_memmap() to populate_section_memmap() Dan Williams
2019-06-06 17:02 ` Oscar Salvador
2019-06-16 6:06 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-06-05 21:58 ` [PATCH v9 05/12] mm/hotplug: Kill is_dev_zone() usage in __remove_pages() Dan Williams
2019-06-05 21:58 ` [PATCH v9 06/12] mm: Kill is_dev_zone() helper Dan Williams
2019-06-18 3:35 ` Wei Yang
2019-06-05 21:58 ` [PATCH v9 07/12] mm/sparsemem: Prepare for sub-section ranges Dan Williams
2019-06-06 17:21 ` Oscar Salvador
2019-06-06 18:16 ` Dan Williams
2019-06-14 8:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-06-05 21:58 ` [PATCH v9 08/12] mm/sparsemem: Support sub-section hotplug Dan Williams
2019-06-07 8:33 ` Oscar Salvador
2019-06-07 15:38 ` Dan Williams
2019-06-07 21:41 ` Oscar Salvador
2019-06-05 21:58 ` [PATCH v9 09/12] mm: Document ZONE_DEVICE memory-model implications Dan Williams
2019-06-05 21:58 ` [PATCH v9 10/12] mm/devm_memremap_pages: Enable sub-section remap Dan Williams
2019-06-07 8:56 ` Oscar Salvador
2019-06-16 7:49 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-06-05 21:58 ` [PATCH v9 11/12] libnvdimm/pfn: Fix fsdax-mode namespace info-block zero-fields Dan Williams
2019-06-06 21:46 ` Andrew Morton
2019-06-06 22:06 ` Dan Williams
2019-06-07 19:54 ` Andrew Morton
2019-06-07 20:09 ` Dan Williams
2019-06-12 9:41 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-06-05 21:59 ` [PATCH v9 12/12] libnvdimm/pfn: Stop padding pmem namespaces to section alignment Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190618014223.GD18161@richard \
--to=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).