From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] mm/memcontrol: reclaim severe usage over high limit in get_user_pages loop
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 11:17:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190729091738.GF9330@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <156431697805.3170.6377599347542228221.stgit@buzz>
On Sun 28-07-19 15:29:38, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> High memory limit in memory cgroup allows to batch memory reclaiming and
> defer it until returning into userland. This moves it out of any locks.
>
> Fixed gap between high and max limit works pretty well (we are using
> 64 * NR_CPUS pages) except cases when one syscall allocates tons of
> memory. This affects all other tasks in cgroup because they might hit
> max memory limit in unhandy places and\or under hot locks.
>
> For example mmap with MAP_POPULATE or MAP_LOCKED might allocate a lot
> of pages and push memory cgroup usage far ahead high memory limit.
>
> This patch uses halfway between high and max limits as threshold and
> in this case starts memory reclaiming if mem_cgroup_handle_over_high()
> called with argument only_severe = true, otherwise reclaim is deferred
> till returning into userland. If high limits isn't set nothing changes.
>
> Now long running get_user_pages will periodically reclaim cgroup memory.
> Other possible targets are generic file read/write iter loops.
I do see how gup can lead to a large high limit excess, but could you be
more specific why is that a problem? We should be reclaiming the similar
number of pages cumulatively.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-29 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-28 12:29 [PATCH RFC] mm/memcontrol: reclaim severe usage over high limit in get_user_pages loop Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-07-29 9:17 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2019-07-29 9:40 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-07-29 10:33 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-29 11:24 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-07-29 17:28 ` Yang Shi
2019-07-29 18:48 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-01 21:00 ` Yang Shi
2019-08-02 9:35 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-02 18:56 ` Yang Shi
2019-08-05 14:32 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-05 19:24 ` Shakeel Butt
2019-08-06 3:28 ` Yang Shi
2019-08-06 7:05 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-29 15:49 ` Johannes Weiner
2019-07-29 18:55 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-02 9:40 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-02 10:01 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-08-02 11:44 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-06 7:07 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-06 7:19 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-08-06 7:36 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190729091738.GF9330@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).