From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1CCC31E40 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 06:18:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17CD32087B for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 06:18:08 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 17CD32087B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 5F2056B0003; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 02:18:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 5A23F6B0005; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 02:18:08 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 4DFBE6B0006; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 02:18:08 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0207.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.207]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F5F6B0003 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 02:18:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin13.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id AF79121F0 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 06:18:07 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 75812770614.13.shape34_6404610582f5f X-HE-Tag: shape34_6404610582f5f X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4978 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by imf03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 06:18:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x7C66ksR018452 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 02:18:06 -0400 Received: from e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.101]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ub25fs1c5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 02:18:06 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 07:18:04 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 12 Aug 2019 07:17:59 +0100 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x7C6HxiO38011134 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 12 Aug 2019 06:17:59 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF31FAE051; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 06:17:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D106AE056; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 06:17:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rapoport-lnx (unknown [9.148.8.59]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 06:17:58 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 09:17:56 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hellstr=F6m?= , Jerome Glisse , Jason Gunthorpe , Steven Price , Linux-MM , Linux List Kernel Mailing Subject: Re: cleanup the walk_page_range interface References: <20190808154240.9384-1-hch@lst.de> <20190808215632.GA12773@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190808215632.GA12773@lst.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19081206-0020-0000-0000-0000035EB031 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19081206-0021-0000-0000-000021B3BDAF Message-Id: <20190812061756.GA28471@rapoport-lnx> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-08-12_03:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1908120068 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 11:56:32PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 10:50:37AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > Note that both Thomas and Steven have series touching this area pending, > > > and there are a couple consumer in flux too - the hmm tree already > > > conflicts with this series, and I have potential dma changes on top of > > > the consumers in Thomas and Steven's series, so we'll probably need a > > > git tree similar to the hmm one to synchronize these updates. > > > > I'd be willing to just merge this now, if that helps. The conversion > > is mechanical, and my only slight worry would be that at least for my > > original patch I didn't build-test the (few) non-x86 > > architecture-specific cases. But I did end up looking at them fairly > > closely (basically using some grep/sed scripts to see that the > > conversions I did matched the same patterns). And your changes look > > like obvious improvements too where any mistake would have been caught > > by the compiler. > > I did cross compile the s390 and powerpc bits, but I do not have an > openrisc compiler. The openrisc defconfig builds fine. > > So I'm not all that worried from a functionality standpoint, and if > > this will help the next merge window, I'll happily pull now. > > That would help with this series vs the others, but not with the other > series vs each other. > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.