linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
	Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
	Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org" <nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/15] mm: remove the pgmap field from struct hmm_vma_walk
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 16:51:33 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190815205132.GC25517@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190815204128.GI22970@mellanox.com>

On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 08:41:33PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 04:33:06PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> 
> > So nor HMM nor driver should dereference the struct page (i do not
> > think any iommu driver would either),
> 
> Er, they do technically deref the struct page:
> 
> nouveau_dmem_convert_pfn(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
> 			 struct hmm_range *range)
> 		struct page *page;
> 		page = hmm_pfn_to_page(range, range->pfns[i]);
> 		if (!nouveau_dmem_page(drm, page)) {
> 
> 
> nouveau_dmem_page(struct nouveau_drm *drm, struct page *page)
> {
> 	return is_device_private_page(page) && drm->dmem == page_to_dmem(page)
> 
> 
> Which does touch 'page->pgmap'
> 
> Is this OK without having a get_dev_pagemap() ?
>
> Noting that the collision-retry scheme doesn't protect anything here
> as we can have a concurrent invalidation while doing the above deref.

Uh ? How so ? We are not reading the same code i think.

My read is that function is call when holding the device
lock which exclude any racing mmu notifier from making
forward progress and it is also protected by the range so
at the time this happens it is safe to dereference the
struct page. In this case any way we can update the
nouveau_dmem_page() to check that page page->pgmap == the
expected pgmap.

Cheers,
Jérôme


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-08-15 20:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-06 16:05 hmm cleanups, v2 Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-06 16:05 ` [PATCH 01/15] amdgpu: remove -EAGAIN handling for hmm_range_fault Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-06 16:05 ` [PATCH 02/15] amdgpu: don't initialize range->list in amdgpu_hmm_init_range Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-06 16:05 ` [PATCH 03/15] nouveau: pass struct nouveau_svmm to nouveau_range_fault Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-06 18:02   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-06 16:05 ` [PATCH 04/15] mm: remove the pgmap field from struct hmm_vma_walk Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-07 17:45   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-07 18:47     ` Dan Williams
2019-08-08  6:59       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-14  1:36         ` Dan Williams
2019-08-14  7:38           ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-14 13:27             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-14 14:48               ` Dan Williams
2019-08-15 18:03                 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-08-15 19:22                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-15 19:36                   ` Dan Williams
2019-08-15 19:43                     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-08-15 20:12                       ` Dan Williams
2019-08-15 20:33                         ` Jerome Glisse
2019-08-15 20:41                           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-15 20:47                             ` Dan Williams
2019-08-16  0:40                               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-16  3:54                                 ` Dan Williams
2019-08-16 12:24                                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-16 17:21                                     ` Dan Williams
2019-08-16 17:28                                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-16 21:10                                         ` Ralph Campbell
2019-08-15 20:51                             ` Jerome Glisse [this message]
2019-08-16  0:43                               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-16  4:44                                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-16 12:30                                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-16 12:34                                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-16  4:41                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-06 16:05 ` [PATCH 05/15] mm: remove the unused vma argument to hmm_range_dma_unmap Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-06 16:05 ` [PATCH 06/15] mm: remove superflous arguments from hmm_range_register Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-06 16:05 ` [PATCH 07/15] mm: remove the page_shift member from struct hmm_range Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-07 17:51   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-06 16:05 ` [PATCH 08/15] mm: remove the mask variable in hmm_vma_walk_hugetlb_entry Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-06 18:02   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-06 16:05 ` [PATCH 09/15] mm: don't abuse pte_index() in hmm_vma_handle_pmd Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-07 17:18   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-06 16:05 ` [PATCH 10/15] mm: only define hmm_vma_walk_pud if needed Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-06 16:05 ` [PATCH 11/15] mm: cleanup the hmm_vma_handle_pmd stub Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-06 18:00   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-06 16:05 ` [PATCH 12/15] mm: cleanup the hmm_vma_walk_hugetlb_entry stub Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-06 16:05 ` [PATCH 13/15] mm: allow HMM_MIRROR on all architectures with MMU Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-06 16:05 ` [PATCH 14/15] mm: make HMM_MIRROR an implicit option Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-06 17:44   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-06 16:05 ` [PATCH 15/15] amdgpu: remove CONFIG_DRM_AMDGPU_USERPTR Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-06 17:44   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-06 17:51     ` Kuehling, Felix
2019-08-06 18:58       ` Alex Deucher
2019-08-06 20:03         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-07  6:57           ` Koenig, Christian
2019-08-07 11:46             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-07 18:17 ` hmm cleanups, v2 Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190815205132.GC25517@redhat.com \
    --to=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).