From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08FF3C3A59C for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 12:33:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D742820644 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 12:33:03 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D742820644 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 8452B6B0003; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 08:33:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 7F4C26B0005; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 08:33:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 70B5A6B000A; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 08:33:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0206.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.206]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 503B76B0003 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 08:33:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin16.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EC1D98410 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 12:33:02 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 75828230604.16.bed65_71de2c68dc423 X-HE-Tag: bed65_71de2c68dc423 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1760 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by imf01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 12:33:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 87FE068B05; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:32:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:32:58 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Linus Torvalds , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hellstr=F6m?= , Jerome Glisse , Steven Price , Linux-MM , Linux List Kernel Mailing , Minchan Kim Subject: Re: cleanup the walk_page_range interface Message-ID: <20190816123258.GA22140@lst.de> References: <20190808154240.9384-1-hch@lst.de> <20190816062751.GA16169@infradead.org> <20190816115735.GB5412@mellanox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190816115735.GB5412@mellanox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:57:40AM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > Are there conflicts with trees other than hmm? > > We can put it on a topic branch and merge to hmm to resolve. If hmm > has problems then send the topic on its own? I see two new walk_page_range user in linux-next related to MADV_COLD support (which probably really should use walk_range_vma), and then there is the series from Steven, which hasn't been merged yet.