From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E287C3A5A6 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 23:34:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090E321883 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 23:34:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="LXm9jCHm" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 090E321883 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id ABBF96B0008; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 19:34:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id A6D3A6B000A; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 19:34:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 983306B000C; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 19:34:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0132.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.132]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79CA66B0008 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 19:34:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin30.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1661F180AD805 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 23:34:34 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 75869814468.30.soda56_7f25104323856 X-HE-Tag: soda56_7f25104323856 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3529 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf38.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 23:34:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-231-172-41.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.172.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 351362186A; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 23:34:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1566948872; bh=u9kCNCuUavGaLUJ2do7q30aA0z/LKW25VjraHn2v2vc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LXm9jCHmK23s8tYo+VE6Lab+PTzMgUi6sRDCTL0vitposmHdXmBpAC+mgt6kTUbFt nIfo1O1h4No9kJag7WO7GxlixmY9oakcfe2fa9j1m3Pxb6/QZaYTir6B6q51dwbT9X mykbsb5rT60Zb9k45E0ee8wQp//7FsxTnbPABkao= Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 16:34:31 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Linus Torvalds , Christoph Hellwig , Thomas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hellstr=F6m?= , Jerome Glisse , Steven Price , Linux-MM , Linux List Kernel Mailing Subject: Re: cleanup the walk_page_range interface Message-Id: <20190827163431.65a284b295004d1ed258fbd5@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20190827013408.GC31766@mellanox.com> References: <20190808154240.9384-1-hch@lst.de> <20190816062751.GA16169@infradead.org> <20190823134308.GH12847@mellanox.com> <20190824222654.GA28766@infradead.org> <20190827013408.GC31766@mellanox.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 01:34:13 +0000 Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 03:26:55PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 01:43:12PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > > So what is the plan forward? Probably a little late for 5.3, > > > > so queue it up in -mm for 5.4 and deal with the conflicts in at least > > > > hmm? Queue it up in the hmm tree even if it doesn't 100% fit? > > > > > > Did we make a decision on this? Due to travel & LPC I'd like to > > > finalize the hmm tree next week. > > > > I don't think we've made any decision. I'd still love to see this > > in hmm.git. It has a minor conflict, but I can resend a rebased > > version. > > I'm looking at this.. The hmm conflict is easy enough to fix. > > But the compile conflict with these two patches in -mm requires some > action from Andrew: > > commit 027b9b8fd9ee3be6b7440462102ec03a2d593213 > Author: Minchan Kim > Date: Sun Aug 25 11:49:27 2019 +1000 > > mm: introduce MADV_PAGEOUT > > commit f227453a14cadd4727dd159782531d617f257001 > Author: Minchan Kim > Date: Sun Aug 25 11:49:27 2019 +1000 > > mm: introduce MADV_COLD > > Patch series "Introduce MADV_COLD and MADV_PAGEOUT", v7. > > I'm inclined to suggest you send this series in the 2nd half of the > merge window after this MADV stuff lands for least disruption? Just merge it, I'll figure it out. Probably by staging Minchan's patches after linux-next.