From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB9EC33CB6 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 02:37:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD2D24697 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 02:37:14 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1FD2D24697 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B111D6B054A; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 21:37:13 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id AC2026B054B; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 21:37:13 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 9FE336B054C; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 21:37:13 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0112.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.112]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0C66B054A for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 21:37:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin22.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 34F3B3A9B for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 02:37:13 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76392821946.22.brass52_3ef777a461e1e X-HE-Tag: brass52_3ef777a461e1e X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2823 Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by imf43.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 02:37:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Jan 2020 18:37:11 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,336,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="424864862" Received: from richard.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.159.54]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Jan 2020 18:37:09 -0800 Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 10:37:20 +0800 From: Wei Yang To: Yang Shi Cc: mhocko@suse.com, richardw.yang@linux.intel.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: move_pages: fix the return value if there are not-migrated pages Message-ID: <20200119023720.GD9745@richard> Reply-To: Wei Yang References: <1579325203-16405-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1579325203-16405-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 01:26:43PM +0800, Yang Shi wrote: >The do_move_pages_to_node() might return > 0 value, the number of pages >that are not migrated, then the value will be returned to userspace >directly. But, move_pages() syscall would just return 0 or errno. So, >we need reset the return value to 0 for such case as what pre-v4.17 did. > >Fixes: a49bd4d71637 ("mm, numa: rework do_pages_move") >Cc: Michal Hocko >Cc: Wei Yang >Cc: [4.17+] >Signed-off-by: Yang Shi >--- > mm/migrate.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c >index 86873b6..3e75432 100644 >--- a/mm/migrate.c >+++ b/mm/migrate.c >@@ -1659,8 +1659,11 @@ static int do_pages_move(struct mm_struct *mm, nodemask_t task_nodes, > goto out_flush; > > err = do_move_pages_to_node(mm, &pagelist, current_node); >- if (err) >+ if (err) { >+ if (err > 0) >+ err = 0; > goto out; >+ } > if (i > start) { > err = store_status(status, start, current_node, i - start); > if (err) >-- >1.8.3.1 Hey, I am afraid you missed something. There are three calls of do_move_pages_to_node() in do_pages_move(). Why you just handle one return value? How about the other two? -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me