From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742F5C32771 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 02:57:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4337B246A9 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 02:57:28 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4337B246A9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id C12FD6B0550; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 21:57:27 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id BC3906B0551; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 21:57:27 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id AD96B6B0552; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 21:57:27 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0043.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.43]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C156B0550 for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 21:57:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin08.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FFF9181AEF00 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 02:57:27 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76392872934.08.jeans74_5e1161de8450e X-HE-Tag: jeans74_5e1161de8450e X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3196 Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by imf34.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 02:57:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Jan 2020 18:57:24 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,336,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="219309692" Received: from richard.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.159.54]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Jan 2020 18:57:22 -0800 Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 10:57:33 +0800 From: Wei Yang To: Wei Yang Cc: Yang Shi , mhocko@suse.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: move_pages: fix the return value if there are not-migrated pages Message-ID: <20200119025733.GG9745@richard> Reply-To: Wei Yang References: <1579325203-16405-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> <20200119023720.GD9745@richard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200119023720.GD9745@richard> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 10:37:20AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: >On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 01:26:43PM +0800, Yang Shi wrote: >>The do_move_pages_to_node() might return > 0 value, the number of pages >>that are not migrated, then the value will be returned to userspace >>directly. But, move_pages() syscall would just return 0 or errno. So, >>we need reset the return value to 0 for such case as what pre-v4.17 did. >> >>Fixes: a49bd4d71637 ("mm, numa: rework do_pages_move") >>Cc: Michal Hocko >>Cc: Wei Yang >>Cc: [4.17+] >>Signed-off-by: Yang Shi >>--- >> mm/migrate.c | 5 ++++- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >>diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c >>index 86873b6..3e75432 100644 >>--- a/mm/migrate.c >>+++ b/mm/migrate.c >>@@ -1659,8 +1659,11 @@ static int do_pages_move(struct mm_struct *mm, nodemask_t task_nodes, >> goto out_flush; >> >> err = do_move_pages_to_node(mm, &pagelist, current_node); >>- if (err) >>+ if (err) { >>+ if (err > 0) >>+ err = 0; >> goto out; >>+ } >> if (i > start) { >> err = store_status(status, start, current_node, i - start); >> if (err) >>-- >>1.8.3.1 > > >Hey, I am afraid you missed something. There are three calls of >do_move_pages_to_node() in do_pages_move(). Why you just handle one return >value? How about the other two? > Well, current logic in do_pages_move() is a little complicated to read. I did a cleanup to make it easy to read and also friendly to do this fix. If they look good to you, you could rebase your fix on top of them. >-- >Wei Yang >Help you, Help me -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me