From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH for 4.19-stable v2 04/24] drivers/base/memory.c: remove an unnecessary check on NR_MEM_SECTIONS
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 19:01:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200121180150.37454-5-david@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200121180150.37454-1-david@redhat.com>
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
commit 3b6fd6ffb27c2efa003c6d4d15ca72c054b71d7c upstream.
In cb5e39b8038b ("drivers: base: refactor add_memory_section() to
add_memory_block()"), add_memory_block() is introduced, which is only
invoked in memory_dev_init().
When combining these two loops in memory_dev_init() and
add_memory_block(), they looks like this:
for (i = 0; i < NR_MEM_SECTIONS; i += sections_per_block)
for (j = i;
(j < i + sections_per_block) && j < NR_MEM_SECTIONS;
j++)
Since it is sure the (i < NR_MEM_SECTIONS) and j sits in its own memory
block, the check of (j < NR_MEM_SECTIONS) is not necessary.
This patch just removes this check.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181123222811.18216-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
drivers/base/memory.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c
index ac1574a69610..5fca7225f3fe 100644
--- a/drivers/base/memory.c
+++ b/drivers/base/memory.c
@@ -691,7 +691,7 @@ static int add_memory_block(int base_section_nr)
int i, ret, section_count = 0, section_nr;
for (i = base_section_nr;
- (i < base_section_nr + sections_per_block) && i < NR_MEM_SECTIONS;
+ i < base_section_nr + sections_per_block;
i++) {
if (!present_section_nr(i))
continue;
--
2.24.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-21 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-21 18:01 [PATCH for 4.19-stable v2 00/24] mm/memory_hotplug: backport of pending stable fixes David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 18:01 ` [PATCH for 4.19-stable v2 01/24] mm/memory_hotplug: make remove_memory() take the device_hotplug_lock David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 18:01 ` [PATCH for 4.19-stable v2 02/24] mm, sparse: drop pgdat_resize_lock in sparse_add/remove_one_section() David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 18:01 ` [PATCH for 4.19-stable v2 03/24] mm, sparse: pass nid instead of pgdat to sparse_add_one_section() David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 18:01 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2020-01-21 18:01 ` [PATCH for 4.19-stable v2 05/24] mm, memory_hotplug: add nid parameter to arch_remove_memory David Hildenbrand
2020-01-22 9:25 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-24 9:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-01-24 9:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 18:01 ` [PATCH for 4.19-stable v2 06/24] mm/memory_hotplug: release memory resource after arch_remove_memory() David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 18:01 ` [PATCH for 4.19-stable v2 07/24] drivers/base/memory.c: clean up relics in function parameters David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 18:01 ` [PATCH for 4.19-stable v2 08/24] mm, memory_hotplug: update a comment in unregister_memory() David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 18:01 ` [PATCH for 4.19-stable v2 09/24] mm/memory_hotplug: make unregister_memory_section() never fail David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 18:01 ` [PATCH for 4.19-stable v2 10/24] mm/memory_hotplug: make __remove_section() " David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 18:01 ` [PATCH for 4.19-stable v2 11/24] powerpc/mm: Fix section mismatch warning David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 18:01 ` [PATCH for 4.19-stable v2 12/24] mm/memory_hotplug: make __remove_pages() and arch_remove_memory() never fail David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 18:01 ` [PATCH for 4.19-stable v2 13/24] s390x/mm: implement arch_remove_memory() David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 18:01 ` [PATCH for 4.19-stable v2 14/24] mm/memory_hotplug: allow arch_remove_memory() without CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 18:01 ` [PATCH for 4.19-stable v2 15/24] drivers/base/memory: pass a block_id to init_memory_block() David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 18:01 ` [PATCH for 4.19-stable v2 16/24] mm/memory_hotplug: create memory block devices after arch_add_memory() David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 18:01 ` [PATCH for 4.19-stable v2 17/24] mm/memory_hotplug: remove memory block devices before arch_remove_memory() David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 18:01 ` [PATCH for 4.19-stable v2 18/24] mm/memory_hotplug: make unregister_memory_block_under_nodes() never fail David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 18:01 ` [PATCH for 4.19-stable v2 19/24] mm/memory_hotplug: remove "zone" parameter from sparse_remove_one_section David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 18:01 ` [PATCH for 4.19-stable v2 20/24] mm/hotplug: kill is_dev_zone() usage in __remove_pages() David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 18:01 ` [PATCH for 4.19-stable v2 21/24] drivers/base/node.c: simplify unregister_memory_block_under_nodes() David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 18:01 ` [PATCH for 4.19-stable v2 22/24] mm/memunmap: don't access uninitialized memmap in memunmap_pages() David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 18:01 ` [PATCH for 4.19-stable v2 23/24] mm/memory_hotplug: fix try_offline_node() David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 18:01 ` [PATCH for 4.19-stable v2 24/24] mm/memory_hotplug: shrink zones when offlining memory David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200121180150.37454-5-david@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).