From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5E3C33CB2 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 05:48:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C30207FF for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 05:48:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="GA4xldnr" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 75C30207FF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 0AA9D6B0005; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:48:04 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 0353A6B0006; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:48:03 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id E3EC36B0007; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:48:03 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0085.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.85]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8216B0005 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:48:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin10.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B9E3499 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 05:48:03 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76429590846.10.wing75_807ee3b7ce408 X-HE-Tag: wing75_807ee3b7ce408 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2741 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf11.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 05:48:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [213.57.247.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 221AE2071E; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 05:48:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1580276881; bh=Y+9aIhN4apiy5tD4uo8NEkUkqCFQBUmX8iUUCn+SJz4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=GA4xldnrfCZ/hBa/e+u4jH+ceiMp46v485VEdcIQS+PL2onNs2Lp344hOSwut0cl5 kMjlKcFvkhxbeePcWEiAlqewXAYnKlDFlVtI4vZlErWp9sEeIGhuDBlR6Xyf3B/MvB 77hB3BnefN51UHOfzz/YcUfa9FLW3mE857JX1mzU= Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 07:47:56 +0200 From: Leon Romanovsky To: John Hubbard Cc: Andrew Morton , Al Viro , Christoph Hellwig , Dan Williams , Dave Chinner , Ira Weiny , Jan Kara , Jason Gunthorpe , Jonathan Corbet , =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly9G1l?= Glisse , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Michal Hocko , Mike Kravetz , Shuah Khan , Vlastimil Babka , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] mm/gup: track FOLL_PIN pages (follow on from v12) Message-ID: <20200129054756.GB3326@unreal> References: <20200125021115.731629-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com> <20200125162339.GA41770@unreal> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200125162339.GA41770@unreal> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 06:23:39PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 06:11:12PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote: > > Leon Romanovsky: > > > > If you get a chance, I'd love to have this short series (or even just > > the first patch; the others are just selftests) run through your test > > suite that was previously choking on my earlier v11 patchset. The huge > > page pincount limitations are removed, so I'm expecting a perfect test > > run this time! > > > > I added those patches to our regression and I will post the in the > couple of days. Hi John, The patches survived our RDMA verification night runs. Thanks > > Thanks >