From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6886C33CB3 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:28:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81458214DB for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:28:03 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 81458214DB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 2DF7B6B0322; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 02:28:03 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 290C96B0323; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 02:28:03 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 1810E6B0324; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 02:28:03 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0180.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.180]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB696B0322 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 02:28:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin27.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADAFB248F for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:28:02 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76433471604.27.song34_291801c69a41a X-HE-Tag: song34_291801c69a41a X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 5826 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by imf39.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:28:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pps.filterd (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 00U7MnB8059098 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 02:28:01 -0500 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2xrvw9qw4r-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 02:28:01 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:27:57 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:27:47 -0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 00U7Rk2i44564690 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:27:47 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD406AE051; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:27:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C847AE04D; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:27:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from linux.ibm.com (unknown [9.148.8.154]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:27:43 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 09:27:41 +0200 From: Mike Rapoport To: Gerald Schaefer Cc: Qian Cai , Anshuman Khandual , Linux-MM , Andrew Morton , Vlastimil Babka , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Thomas Gleixner , Mike Rapoport , Jason Gunthorpe , Dan Williams , Peter Zijlstra , Michal Hocko , Mark Rutland , Mark Brown , Steven Price , Ard Biesheuvel , Masahiro Yamada , Kees Cook , Tetsuo Handa , Matthew Wilcox , Sri Krishna chowdary , Dave Hansen , Russell King - ARM Linux , Michael Ellerman , Paul Mackerras , Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , "David S. Miller" , Vineet Gupta , James Hogan , Paul Burton , Ralf Baechle , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Christophe Leroy , Ingo Molnar , linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V12] mm/debug: Add tests validating architecture page table helpers References: <1580174873-18117-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> <14882A91-17DE-4ABD-ABF2-08E7CCEDF660@lca.pw> <214c0d53-eb34-9b0c-2e4e-1aa005146331@arm.com> <016A776F-EFD9-4D2B-A3A9-788008617D95@lca.pw> <20200129232044.2d133d98@thinkpad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200129232044.2d133d98@thinkpad> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20013007-0008-0000-0000-0000034DFF2E X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20013007-0009-0000-0000-00004A6E7E76 Message-Id: <20200130072741.GA23707@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.572 definitions=2020-01-30_01:2020-01-28,2020-01-30 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=56 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1911200001 definitions=main-2001300049 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 11:20:44PM +0100, Gerald Schaefer wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 22:33:08 -0500 > > For example, who would have thought that pXd_bad() is supposed to > report large entries as bad? It's not really documented anywhere, A bit off-topic, @Anshuman, maybe you could start a Documentation/ patch that describes at least some of the pXd_whaterver()? Or that would be too much to ask? ;-) > so we just checked them for sanity like normal entries, which > apparently worked fine so far, but for how long? -- Sincerely yours, Mike.