From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>,
qiwuchen55@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, chenqiwu <chenqiwu@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan: fix incorrect return type for cgroup_reclaim()
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 08:28:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200320072820.GA24409@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200319173606.GL22433@bombadil.infradead.org>
On Thu 19-03-20 10:36:06, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 04:20:25PM +0000, Chris Down wrote:
[...]
> > > -static bool cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
> > > +static struct mem_cgroup *cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
> > > {
> > > - return false;
> > > + return NULL;
> > > }
>
> I think this is actually the important bit. For those who build
> their kernels with cgroups disabled, it will save a small number of
> instructions since cgroup_reclaim() will be NULL rather than dereferencing
> sc->target_mem_group. It'd be nice to have that saving quantified as
> part of the changelog.
I gave it a try and you are right that !MEMCG is slightly better. But
MEMCG=y which is a more common configuration I would say is worse
text data bss dec hex filename
40661 24060 12 64733 fcdd mm/vmscan.memcg.after.o
40556 24060 12 64628 fc74 mm/vmscan.memcg.before.o
36240 23076 8 59324 e7bc mm/vmscan.nomemcg.after.o
36283 23076 8 59367 e7e7 mm/vmscan.nomemcg.before.o
This is with gcc version 9.2.1 20200306 (Debian 9.2.1-31).
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-20 7:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-19 15:50 [PATCH] mm/vmscan: fix incorrect return type for cgroup_reclaim() qiwuchen55
2020-03-19 16:07 ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-20 7:34 ` Baoquan He
2020-03-19 16:20 ` Chris Down
2020-03-19 17:36 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-03-20 2:29 ` chenqiwu
2020-03-20 7:28 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2020-03-20 2:20 ` chenqiwu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200320072820.GA24409@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chenqiwu@xiaomi.com \
--cc=chris@chrisdown.name \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=qiwuchen55@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).