linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	<linux-mm@kvack.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: clarify __GFP_MEMALLOC usage
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 19:15:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200413191532.6b234b50caea9134fb95a151@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <efbdbe8f-f4fe-cfc8-4f15-1e19ee0bf416@nvidia.com>


I've rather lost the plot with this little patch.  Is the below
suitable, or do we think that changes are needed?


From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: mm: clarify __GFP_MEMALLOC usage

It seems that the existing documentation is not explicit about the
expected usage and potential risks enough.  While it is calls out that
users have to free memory when using this flag it is not really apparent
that users have to careful to not deplete memory reserves and that they
should implement some sort of throttling wrt.  freeing process.

This is partly based on Neil's explanation [1].

Let's also call out that a pre allocated pool allocator should be
considered.

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/877dz0yxoa.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding style fixes]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200403083543.11552-2-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
[mhocko@kernel.org: update]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200406070137.GC19426@dhcp22.suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 include/linux/gfp.h |    5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

--- a/include/linux/gfp.h~mm-clarify-__gfp_memalloc-usage
+++ a/include/linux/gfp.h
@@ -110,6 +110,11 @@ struct vm_area_struct;
  * the caller guarantees the allocation will allow more memory to be freed
  * very shortly e.g. process exiting or swapping. Users either should
  * be the MM or co-ordinating closely with the VM (e.g. swap over NFS).
+ * Users of this flag have to be extremely careful to not deplete the reserve
+ * completely and implement a throttling mechanism which controls the
+ * consumption of the reserve based on the amount of freed memory.
+ * Usage of a pre-allocated pool (e.g. mempool) should be always considered
+ * before using this flag.
  *
  * %__GFP_NOMEMALLOC is used to explicitly forbid access to emergency reserves.
  * This takes precedence over the %__GFP_MEMALLOC flag if both are set.
_



  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-14  2:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-03  8:35 [PATCH 0/2] mm: few refinements to gfp flags documentation Michal Hocko
2020-04-03  8:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: clarify __GFP_MEMALLOC usage Michal Hocko
2020-04-03 19:41   ` David Rientjes
2020-04-03 21:23     ` NeilBrown
2020-04-06  7:01       ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-06 19:02         ` John Hubbard
2020-04-06 23:32           ` David Rientjes
2020-04-06 23:40             ` John Hubbard
2020-04-14  2:15               ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2020-04-14  3:56                 ` NeilBrown
2020-04-14 19:05                   ` John Hubbard
2020-04-07  1:00           ` NeilBrown
2020-04-07  1:21             ` John Hubbard
2020-04-07  7:24             ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-03  8:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: make it clear that gfp reclaim modifiers are valid only for sleepable allocations Michal Hocko
2020-04-03 19:41   ` David Rientjes
2020-04-07  1:38     ` Joel Fernandes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200413191532.6b234b50caea9134fb95a151@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).