From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D97C2BA19 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 19:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C88C2206A2 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 19:02:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="e+ReKYew" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C88C2206A2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 663CD8E0003; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 15:02:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 613968E0001; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 15:02:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 550E38E0003; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 15:02:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0232.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.232]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ECDB8E0001 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 15:02:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin24.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FC45DE3 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 19:02:28 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76707381576.24.blood58_8a0cfd234c417 X-HE-Tag: blood58_8a0cfd234c417 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4431 Received: from mail-lj1-f194.google.com (mail-lj1-f194.google.com [209.85.208.194]) by imf29.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 19:02:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-f194.google.com with SMTP id r7so948814ljg.13 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:02:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=HK82X0VEp89OA9Y+MX3MtVkgahLviMMIweBp5dX6xeo=; b=e+ReKYewQus+4U70NmQegviOuZR87lmwMKXd6/CR6t0HAhXmRyUnKW+ntRBb2UxHEx uGin2hJ6oiKXaIThPGuP0GR4/9sAK6AH2z3IO8iAyII2KHOgCsbCGomUa320IMVATSRl tuOeYOnU9MXql33AUIEGYaW33NlXBYjLl4zPGdj1NdD05sK4BJBMOFMLwjQnOgXmeLfC rfe7QFO9jxxZntT2fL5soGssamSceeKhwEbggDkJTNDy9Z6KsNr1W2msensPFYQ5pKqM eoRShAqPh5SbSehjD4TuqPAzukow2QGtqYVkaRlubaz5A26HKraomVMhXRirci/ZAeCY kDrw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=HK82X0VEp89OA9Y+MX3MtVkgahLviMMIweBp5dX6xeo=; b=F0GqK/tr+Vstm5opz2lenG2GT/YsyGLh+SDqHxMODHOOzwBKSbCORm+K3hRhu0//l2 fwWmdugLkoseizeUCUsSNQyG3YdqKydGrWrnm2Z9kn71kqJASmSa9siw77c5v7SLx10N 0ziyUr0g2CCthJvKy/ZCeLrRuil97/ZjFlOwECckQgL2rFbdCAEdl7o2XPuzcJycESa0 YeiGTHK9iR8mGJYOta649POe0bcmtqhLgYSSMuxmp948PiQZzbM+VXyLbe0MWomIRC8t baEapg+JjyQPJp0Ieot7MbG0JO7MN2s6bUFq+uIYAhtHmBWjIZw+nDUKlq7rIiXUzaom yScA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Pua5UCD5MukYqSw/86QINd1i3EiDKkMyrNYKv9DsjnUlJztT+4Ah BE0mAhVQNmjDmNfm14txAb4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKkCytYOVS2+WizB3cBtHU3jsyUjkVqeOkXZKDTeOm9NvxG0mKvR4Ly7Nrs/F+godiFvbC6XA== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9a87:: with SMTP id p7mr930038lji.61.1586890946998; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:02:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc636 (h5ef52e31.seluork.dyn.perspektivbredband.net. [94.245.46.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j15sm5887lja.71.2020.04.14.12.02.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:02:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Uladzislau Rezki X-Google-Original-From: Uladzislau Rezki Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 21:02:15 +0200 To: Dave Hansen , Liu Song Cc: Liu Song , gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jroedel@suse.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "liu.song11@zte.com.cnhange-folder>?" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/vmalloc: make sure to traverse from the beginning when overflow occur Message-ID: <20200414190215.GA1531@pc636> References: <20200412143803.43931-1-fishland@aliyun.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 08:02:49AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 4/12/20 7:38 AM, Liu Song wrote: > > If overflow, should ensure that "free_vmap_cache" is set to NULL, > > so as to ensure that it can be traversed from the beginning. > > This changelog is a bit sparse. > > Does this fix a demonstrated problem? Or was it just discovered via > code review and assumed to help a theoretical problem? > > Which tree is it against? 'free_vmap_cache' doesn't show up in Linus's > tree. > > diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c > > index d8e877365f9f..2638a20d36ce 100644 > > --- a/mm/vmalloc.c > > +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c > > @@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ static struct vmap_area *alloc_vmap_area(unsigned long size, > > if (!free_vmap_cache || > > size < cached_hole_size || > > vstart < cached_vstart || > > - align < cached_align) { > > + align < cached_align || purged) { > > nocache: > > cached_hole_size = 0; > > free_vmap_cache = NULL; > > We do not have such code since 5.2 kernel or so, nor things like cached_hole_size, free_vmap_cache and so on. It was totally reworked. -- Vlad Rezki