From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Tyler Baicar <tyler@amperecomputing.com>,
Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mm/memory-failure: Add memory_failure_queue_kick()
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 12:58:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200518125828.e4e3973c743556e976c5ee65@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49686237.p6yG9EJavU@kreacher>
On Mon, 18 May 2020 14:45:05 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> On Friday, May 1, 2020 6:45:41 PM CEST James Morse wrote:
> > The GHES code calls memory_failure_queue() from IRQ context to schedule
> > work on the current CPU so that memory_failure() can sleep.
> >
> > For synchronous memory errors the arch code needs to know any signals
> > that memory_failure() will trigger are pending before it returns to
> > user-space, possibly when exiting from the IRQ.
> >
> > Add a helper to kick the memory failure queue, to ensure the scheduled
> > work has happened. This has to be called from process context, so may
> > have been migrated from the original cpu. Pass the cpu the work was
> > queued on.
> >
> > Change memory_failure_work_func() to permit being called on the 'wrong'
> > cpu.
> >
> > --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> > @@ -3012,6 +3012,7 @@ enum mf_flags {
> > };
> > extern int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags);
> > extern void memory_failure_queue(unsigned long pfn, int flags);
> > +extern void memory_failure_queue_kick(int cpu);
> > extern int unpoison_memory(unsigned long pfn);
> > extern int get_hwpoison_page(struct page *page);
> > #define put_hwpoison_page(page) put_page(page)
> > diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> > index a96364be8ab4..c4afb407bf0f 100644
> > --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> > +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> > @@ -1493,7 +1493,7 @@ static void memory_failure_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
> > unsigned long proc_flags;
> > int gotten;
> >
> > - mf_cpu = this_cpu_ptr(&memory_failure_cpu);
> > + mf_cpu = container_of(work, struct memory_failure_cpu, work);
> > for (;;) {
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&mf_cpu->lock, proc_flags);
> > gotten = kfifo_get(&mf_cpu->fifo, &entry);
> > @@ -1507,6 +1507,19 @@ static void memory_failure_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Process memory_failure work queued on the specified CPU.
> > + * Used to avoid return-to-userspace racing with the memory_failure workqueue.
> > + */
> > +void memory_failure_queue_kick(int cpu)
> > +{
> > + struct memory_failure_cpu *mf_cpu;
> > +
> > + mf_cpu = &per_cpu(memory_failure_cpu, cpu);
> > + cancel_work_sync(&mf_cpu->work);
> > + memory_failure_work_func(&mf_cpu->work);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int __init memory_failure_init(void)
> > {
> > struct memory_failure_cpu *mf_cpu;
> >
>
> I could apply this provided an ACK from the mm people.
>
Naoya Horiguchi is the memory-failure.c person. A review would be
appreciated please?
I'm struggling with it a bit. memory_failure_queue_kick() should be
called on the cpu which is identified by arg `cpu', yes?
memory_failure_work_func() appears to assume this.
If that's right then a) why bother passing in the `cpu' arg? and b)
what keeps this thread pinned to that CPU? cancel_work_sync() can
schedule.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-18 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-01 16:45 [PATCH v2 0/3] ACPI / APEI: Kick the memory_failure() queue for synchronous errors James Morse
2020-05-01 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm/memory-failure: Add memory_failure_queue_kick() James Morse
2020-05-18 12:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-05-18 19:58 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2020-05-19 3:15 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2020-05-19 17:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-05-01 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ACPI / APEI: Kick the memory_failure() queue for synchronous errors James Morse
2020-05-01 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: acpi: Make apei_claim_sea() synchronise with APEI's irq work James Morse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200518125828.e4e3973c743556e976c5ee65@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=tyler@amperecomputing.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).