From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] /dev/mem: Revoke mappings when a driver claims the region
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 20:01:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202005211950.D56130B81@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159009507306.847224.8502634072429766747.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 02:06:17PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> The typical usage of unmap_mapping_range() is part of
> truncate_pagecache() to punch a hole in a file, but in this case the
> implementation is only doing the "first half" of a hole punch. Namely it
> is just evacuating current established mappings of the "hole", and it
> relies on the fact that /dev/mem establishes mappings in terms of
> absolute physical address offsets. Once existing mmap users are
> invalidated they can attempt to re-establish the mapping, or attempt to
> continue issuing read(2) / write(2) to the invalidated extent, but they
> will then be subject to the CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM checking that can
> block those subsequent accesses.
Nice!
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
And a thread hijack... ;)
I think this is very close to providing a way to solve another issue
I've had with /dev/mem, which is to zero the view of the first 1MB of
/dev/mem via mmap. I only fixed the read/write accesses:
a4866aa81251 ("mm: Tighten x86 /dev/mem with zeroing reads")
I.e. the low 1MB range should be considered allowed, but any reads will see
zeros.
> + unmap_mapping_range(inode->i_mapping, res->start, resource_size(res), 1);
Is unmap_mapping_range() sufficient for this? Would it need to happen
once during open_port() or something more special during mmap_mem()?
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-22 3:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-21 21:06 [PATCH v4] /dev/mem: Revoke mappings when a driver claims the region Dan Williams
2020-05-22 3:01 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2022-04-06 19:45 ` Kees Cook
2022-04-07 18:47 ` Dan Williams
2022-04-07 23:43 ` Dan Williams
2022-04-08 3:35 ` Kees Cook
2022-04-08 6:51 ` Dan Williams
2022-04-07 23:46 ` Kees Cook
2021-05-27 20:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-05-27 21:30 ` Dan Williams
2021-05-28 8:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-28 16:42 ` Dan Williams
2021-05-28 16:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-06-03 3:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-03 4:15 ` Dan Williams
2021-06-03 18:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-03 18:28 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202005211950.D56130B81@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).