From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF34C433DF for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 19:51:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F142088E for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 19:51:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="YKbLOw6L" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 78F142088E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.dk Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 3E343800B9; Tue, 26 May 2020 15:51:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 368F680010; Tue, 26 May 2020 15:51:32 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 19536800B9; Tue, 26 May 2020 15:51:32 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0018.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.18]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F7E80010 for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 15:51:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin29.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99FC9181AC9BF for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 19:51:31 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76859914782.29.cause69_649ac1fbd1648 X-HE-Tag: cause69_649ac1fbd1648 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 6260 Received: from mail-pj1-f66.google.com (mail-pj1-f66.google.com [209.85.216.66]) by imf28.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 19:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pj1-f66.google.com with SMTP id s69so257679pjb.4 for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 12:51:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fQihCl0dLbHaElgiRrlXkibi9/E8OKsaJ7lF0uUyO/s=; b=YKbLOw6LpYloCfEz6cSjXDp7lo/SEH14850NuBSfnHJZqbSNda9ft1KrD9kDTlgX29 i5p9OTzKmGtxOrMHS+JBQto/yzM9zXGeRvk09gakJOY0/1BHuWAqj05obqvWTcQqZXjM tSs3FQLGux7Ieod96lB3tb6zv/Ei+e+rH+jvFEsgFfzk6f2Q6xviMQedqciMUxeS5bww YudmGt61FcA28hKFe3zbgPJZzUu27iwTT39ESm3iUzvAQWSmULv85wglM46pdLh9xw2G 2vQ4GSnPWkUwbN9Hsml5BFWibSXp84PL/jR8cl2CQ0mI7mUEGk1xtvkYObM/1b+lAY5j 3Wiw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fQihCl0dLbHaElgiRrlXkibi9/E8OKsaJ7lF0uUyO/s=; b=JSjVZ0+BVGyWtAdxccnq2Qha4t55KexrxmvRIVNf7m0Lhop7EuTNR0wGG7a8HH3eYN 2gmB18MKpKfFaMFATYyuW+SvbjeNbKiUhRRjA/BRCz0gfgOO4TRyIPz37iY0ErmOkGD5 N2bGyf7bUIoECmpfyPKFXDD6se3dmT6pVIun6FfejK27Fam4fBAc3B70UbX978g+wkBE nL6d0/7q1+463Dfa9qzIx3DaYMT601kTZK/pJaFtgmnqJ6DNU69yTvgLrV/4cJ2pt9XK C4tXdi6jYkNdIe6aZT6uD0eanPNIKCFh72Jufhd5Qf9jKPH6d2385BF+EGIg652o9eEY YSdw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530UwiczIAY0gjcfodwAAbMdWMF0vH72wOTUMPfbyZKvmDXw0bkN DYhOjsAzbI++T2tT+IHr/pnJAzbpjLwuUw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyeEiZx5SIpedWyfYllR0duff8tGiFVV6KjQ7XygtXqKPG6eKYMQBb6I07aOaSUrZejp48HpQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:f283:: with SMTP id fs3mr874913pjb.1.1590522690209; Tue, 26 May 2020 12:51:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from x1.lan ([2605:e000:100e:8c61:94bb:59d2:caf6:70e1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c184sm313943pfc.57.2020.05.26.12.51.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 26 May 2020 12:51:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Jens Axboe To: io-uring@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Jens Axboe Subject: [PATCH 03/12] mm: abstract out wake_page_match() from wake_page_function() Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 13:51:14 -0600 Message-Id: <20200526195123.29053-4-axboe@kernel.dk> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 In-Reply-To: <20200526195123.29053-1-axboe@kernel.dk> References: <20200526195123.29053-1-axboe@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: No functional changes in this patch, just in preparation for allowing more callers. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- include/linux/pagemap.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ mm/filemap.c | 35 ++++------------------------------- 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h index a8f7bd8ea1c6..53d980f2208d 100644 --- a/include/linux/pagemap.h +++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h @@ -456,6 +456,43 @@ static inline pgoff_t linear_page_index(struct vm_ar= ea_struct *vma, return pgoff; } =20 +/* This has the same layout as wait_bit_key - see fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c *= / +struct wait_page_key { + struct page *page; + int bit_nr; + int page_match; +}; + +struct wait_page_queue { + struct page *page; + int bit_nr; + wait_queue_entry_t wait; +}; + +static inline int wake_page_match(struct wait_page_queue *wait_page, + struct wait_page_key *key) +{ + if (wait_page->page !=3D key->page) + return 0; + key->page_match =3D 1; + + if (wait_page->bit_nr !=3D key->bit_nr) + return 0; + + /* + * Stop walking if it's locked. + * Is this safe if put_and_wait_on_page_locked() is in use? + * Yes: the waker must hold a reference to this page, and if PG_locked + * has now already been set by another task, that task must also hold + * a reference to the *same usage* of this page; so there is no need + * to walk on to wake even the put_and_wait_on_page_locked() callers. + */ + if (test_bit(key->bit_nr, &key->page->flags)) + return -1; + + return 1; +} + extern void __lock_page(struct page *page); extern int __lock_page_killable(struct page *page); extern int __lock_page_or_retry(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm, diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c index 80747f1377d5..e891b5bee8fd 100644 --- a/mm/filemap.c +++ b/mm/filemap.c @@ -990,43 +990,16 @@ void __init pagecache_init(void) page_writeback_init(); } =20 -/* This has the same layout as wait_bit_key - see fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c *= / -struct wait_page_key { - struct page *page; - int bit_nr; - int page_match; -}; - -struct wait_page_queue { - struct page *page; - int bit_nr; - wait_queue_entry_t wait; -}; - static int wake_page_function(wait_queue_entry_t *wait, unsigned mode, i= nt sync, void *arg) { struct wait_page_key *key =3D arg; struct wait_page_queue *wait_page =3D container_of(wait, struct wait_page_queue, wait); + int ret; =20 - if (wait_page->page !=3D key->page) - return 0; - key->page_match =3D 1; - - if (wait_page->bit_nr !=3D key->bit_nr) - return 0; - - /* - * Stop walking if it's locked. - * Is this safe if put_and_wait_on_page_locked() is in use? - * Yes: the waker must hold a reference to this page, and if PG_locked - * has now already been set by another task, that task must also hold - * a reference to the *same usage* of this page; so there is no need - * to walk on to wake even the put_and_wait_on_page_locked() callers. - */ - if (test_bit(key->bit_nr, &key->page->flags)) - return -1; - + ret =3D wake_page_match(wait_page, key); + if (ret !=3D 1) + return ret; return autoremove_wake_function(wait, mode, sync, key); } =20 --=20 2.26.2