From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F11C433E0 for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:57:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D6A206A4 for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:57:56 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 63D6A206A4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 9A8D98001A; Fri, 29 May 2020 09:57:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 9595A80010; Fri, 29 May 2020 09:57:55 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 8963E8001A; Fri, 29 May 2020 09:57:55 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0120.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.120]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7316480010 for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 09:57:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin20.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EFE2181AC9CC for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:57:55 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76869910110.20.brick10_622b1660dd322 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin20.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1000F180C07AB for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:57:55 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: brick10_622b1660dd322 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2090 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by imf47.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:57:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 40A5D68B02; Fri, 29 May 2020 15:57:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 15:57:51 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Randy Dunlap , Andrew Morton , broonie@kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, mhocko@suse.cz, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, Josh Poimboeuf , Linus Torvalds , viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, hch@lst.de, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: mmotm 2020-05-13-20-30 uploaded (objtool warnings) Message-ID: <20200529135750.GA1580@lst.de> References: <20200514033104.kRFL_ctMQ%akpm@linux-foundation.org> <611fa14d-8d31-796f-b909-686d9ebf84a9@infradead.org> <20200528172005.GP2483@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200528172005.GP2483@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1000F180C07AB X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 07:20:05PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > on x86_64: > > > > arch/x86/lib/csum-wrappers_64.o: warning: objtool: csum_and_copy_from_user()+0x2a4: call to memset() with UACCESS enabled > > arch/x86/lib/csum-wrappers_64.o: warning: objtool: csum_and_copy_to_user()+0x243: return with UACCESS enabled > > Urgh, that's horrible code. That's got plain stac()/clac() calls on > instead of the regular uaccess APIs. Does it? If this is from the code in linux-next, then the code does a user_access_begin/end in csum_and_copy_{from,to}_user, then uses unsafe_{get,put}_user inside those function itself. But then they call csum_partial_copy_generic with the __user casted away, but without any comment on why this is safe.