From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47AABC433E2 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 19:24:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79CD206D7 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 19:24:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="JWOkDkyk" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D79CD206D7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 399EE8D00CD; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 15:24:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 34B4D8D00A0; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 15:24:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 2602F8D00CD; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 15:24:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0096.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.96]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C3F88D00A0 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 15:24:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin02.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67C8159F44 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 19:24:35 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76921536510.02.wall29_3807bac26dde Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C77159F47 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 19:24:35 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: wall29_3807bac26dde X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3165 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) by imf26.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 19:24:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=XNIkzHywKoH/b5FoSCgmMlwYaQtQXQo8Xsv8G4L19+I=; b=JWOkDkykP2kWcImMSx7orhKPGu HQqxsoObXbcgFBrMCclC291CBzUDZx+2r9YIPj5QmzHGlljusdNWhWkt6AC8D25b5ACpf9qxNGPMF f63BTFa3uWqJy4FaDGSz4Xh7rhJ4r9uMrqhzkGE4orGEFDDXzGymYhPSnJtz5/lqSNqF3bEFleH8F iZIIcvEQlPD6tS8dtKPW88CcpSZ5YBV3xOYh88RSIxEzL+FbipCq/pC+XntBHNCTHzsTXGM9zEmWU EZgqeVnfWg6mVgRLnanPIeMXv4T1rolzFIX4uMCeBAwTlkYXQvqQTjLYt+DHwJnFjLV3cRYpXlcq2 w2uGuFGA==; Received: from willy by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jjpHu-0007JA-Bk; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 19:24:26 +0000 Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 12:24:26 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox To: John Hubbard Cc: Andrew Morton , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , Vlastimil Babka , =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly9G1l?= Glisse , Jan Kara , Dave Chinner , Souptick Joarder , Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs: mm/gup: pin_user_pages.rst: add a "case 5" Message-ID: <20200612192426.GK8681@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <20200529234309.484480-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com> <20200529234309.484480-2-jhubbard@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200529234309.484480-2-jhubbard@nvidia.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 94C77159F47 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 04:43:08PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote: > +CASE 5: Pinning in order to write to the data within the page > +------------------------------------------------------------- > +Even though neither DMA nor Direct IO is involved, just a simple case of "pin, > +access page's data, unpin" can cause a problem. Case 5 may be considered a > +superset of Case 1, plus Case 2, plus anything that invokes that pattern. In > +other words, if the code is neither Case 1 nor Case 2, it may still require > +FOLL_PIN, for patterns like this: > + > +Correct (uses FOLL_PIN calls): > + pin_user_pages() > + access the data within the pages > + set_page_dirty_lock() > + unpin_user_pages() > + > +INCORRECT (uses FOLL_GET calls): > + get_user_pages() > + access the data within the pages > + set_page_dirty_lock() > + put_page() Why does this case need to pin? Why can't it just do ... get_user_pages() lock_page(page); ... modify the data ... set_page_dirty(page); unlock_page(page);