From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF71C433E1 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:58:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B6020776 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:58:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chrisdown.name header.i=@chrisdown.name header.b="oHJZsmwD" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 31B6020776 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=chrisdown.name Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 9B5996B0003; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:58:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 967746B000D; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:58:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 855C56B0022; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:58:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0169.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.169]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5076B0003 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:58:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin13.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07724B16B for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:58:02 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76938857604.13.dust49_11105ca26e08 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin13.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D383F18140D63 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:58:01 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: dust49_11105ca26e08 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 5856 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com (mail-wr1-f67.google.com [209.85.221.67]) by imf07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:58:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id t18so2449598wru.6 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 06:58:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chrisdown.name; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=czz/LMTUSEyCUOCBc2bpVTh7IggBB8ARvYVKv0fzm0w=; b=oHJZsmwDgazVpFYFy9f1b0DXnvsC0m5vxNXELt2qWUG2KfVfS0Fn9Az8Mm4tsT5Yun T0BN8K2g46PCiRW5Vtd3CYq9U6e5qZuldGsqUGrQVKibeXmeDBk6U6AB2EVkl4AOMQoQ bb1tNkHgfcvlaxd0Rj1tDcDG32lDe0/EQGnL4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=czz/LMTUSEyCUOCBc2bpVTh7IggBB8ARvYVKv0fzm0w=; b=VOd3Rw9d+Xq1qKIHNQqur4ArGe3yp2lK85E6Tm+YD8KggagNS0v9gI1vUjZPNckvzU lrlFnKy6HA03TYal8u3W7R3toXhgfMLXiJybB5xS2QNazMheMRtA8WRmLZooYnSe5RlH mEsVEAuiPLrLvE5L2w3WolrKE02YcaB20yp119pb+sS6nZ+wUdTzTw4+xrVc1sHEIjPu 5a7HbvHySzEd3lGIyNL37LvOK/GU5QQIT6RGVpq/K/WvmycJJr8oBG+r9wGF6yqtxTcQ aNPng3PAJ+HhwZbGXIgFlKkNVO56X8rj9ukNWmVd1twB1DK8oravQN4sGRY+4QvTfnm9 OEdg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533iKAgjnBBXmREFQU+F7LSPNn8HFvUBkLEdohj3GCgedqU/gjXB UfSByl7HhKAAqmeHD225rQXgow== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxEWNxFxNxnJ3uLML+OdoNnGyXOqpBVbo7UMqTkjK8aBRi7UkKmaFuOunrzbNW+H9nqkV6M+Q== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4286:: with SMTP id k6mr8336535wrq.140.1592402279710; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 06:57:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a01:4b00:8432:8a00:63de:dd93:20be:f460]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 67sm35206526wrk.49.2020.06.17.06.57.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 17 Jun 2020 06:57:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 14:57:58 +0100 From: Chris Down To: Naresh Kamboju Cc: Michal Hocko , Yafang Shao , Anders Roxell , "Linux F2FS DEV, Mailing List" , linux-ext4 , linux-block , Andrew Morton , open list , Linux-Next Mailing List , linux-mm , Arnd Bergmann , Andreas Dilger , Jaegeuk Kim , Theodore Ts'o , Chao Yu , Hugh Dickins , Andrea Arcangeli , Matthew Wilcox , Chao Yu , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Johannes Weiner , Roman Gushchin , Cgroups Subject: Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page Message-ID: <20200617135758.GA548179@chrisdown.name> References: <20200519075213.GF32497@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200519084535.GG32497@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200520190906.GA558281@chrisdown.name> <20200521095515.GK6462@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200521163450.GV6462@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.14.3 (2020-06-14) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D383F18140D63 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Naresh Kamboju writes: >mkfs -t ext4 /dev/disk/by-id/ata-TOSHIBA_MG04ACA100N_Y8RQK14KF6XF >mke2fs 1.43.8 (1-Jan-2018) >Creating filesystem with 244190646 4k blocks and 61054976 inodes >Filesystem UUID: 7c380766-0ed8-41ba-a0de-3c08e78f1891 >Superblock backups stored on blocks: >32768, 98304, 163840, 229376, 294912, 819200, 884736, 1605632, 2654208, >4096000, 7962624, 11239424, 20480000, 23887872, 71663616, 78675968, >102400000, 214990848 >Allocating group tables: 0/7453 done >Writing inode tables: 0/7453 done >Creating journal (262144 blocks): [ 51.544525] under min:0 emin:0 >[ 51.845304] under min:0 emin:0 >[ 51.848738] under min:0 emin:0 >[ 51.858147] under min:0 emin:0 >[ 51.861333] under min:0 emin:0 >[ 51.862034] under min:0 emin:0 >[ 51.862442] under min:0 emin:0 >[ 51.862763] under min:0 emin:0 Thanks, this helps a lot. Somehow we're entering mem_cgroup_below_min even when min/emin is 0 (which should indeed be the case if you haven't set them in the hierarchy). My guess is that page_counter_read(&memcg->memory) is 0, which means mem_cgroup_below_min will return 1. However, I don't know for sure why that should then result in the OOM killer coming along. My guess is that since this memcg has 0 pages to scan anyway, we enter premature OOM under some conditions. I don't know why we wouldn't have hit that with the old version of mem_cgroup_protected that returned MEMCG_PROT_* members, though. Can you please try the patch with the `>=` checks in mem_cgroup_below_min and mem_cgroup_below_low changed to `>`? If that fixes it, then that gives a strong hint about what's going on here. Thanks for your help!