From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74F7C433DF for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:07:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8517323B06 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:07:43 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8517323B06 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=de.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id CA5376B0023; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 08:07:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id C2E186B0025; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 08:07:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id AF5B06B0026; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 08:07:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0157.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.157]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939DF6B0023 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 08:07:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin06.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F43D2C7C for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:07:42 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76982125164.06.bone01_6209ac626e6f Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A16E1003B113 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:07:40 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: bone01_6209ac626e6f X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4819 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by imf16.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:07:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pps.filterd (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 05TC3mjr080192; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 08:07:39 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 31x1rupwev-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 08:07:38 -0400 Received: from m0187473.ppops.net (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 05TC4HMe081091; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 08:07:36 -0400 Received: from ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (66.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.102]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 31x1rupw9r-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 08:07:36 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 05TC2658008359; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:07:28 GMT Received: from b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.194]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 31wwch2637-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:07:28 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 05TC7PkX21823872 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:07:25 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7EB74C050; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:07:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3314C063; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:07:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from osiris (unknown [9.171.82.53]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:07:25 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:07:23 +0200 From: Heiko Carstens To: David Hildenbrand Cc: Gerald Schaefer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] s390x/vmem: get rid of memory segment list Message-ID: <20200629120723.GD4468@osiris> References: <20200625150029.45019-1-david@redhat.com> <20200626192253.2281d95d@thinkpad> <20200626204621.55248f99@thinkpad> <20200629115537.GC4468@osiris> <0c783dbb-630c-6440-74b8-8b40af146d6a@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0c783dbb-630c-6440-74b8-8b40af146d6a@redhat.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216,18.0.687 definitions=2020-06-29_11:2020-06-29,2020-06-29 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 cotscore=-2147483648 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=1 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2006290087 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0A16E1003B113 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 02:01:22PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 29.06.20 13:55, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 08:46:21PM +0200, Gerald Schaefer wrote: > >> Verified with DCSS overlapping boot and standby memory, works fine. > >> As expected, the error message changes, but I don't think that is a > >> problem, as long as you also remove the old -ENOSPC case / comment > >> in arch/s390/mm/extmem.c. It is actually more correct now I guess, > >> -ENOSPC doesn't look like the correct return value anyway. > >> > >> Thanks for cleaning up! Looks good to me, and removes > 100 LOC, > >> unless Heiko remembers some other issues from ancient times. > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Gerald Schaefer > >> Tested-by: Gerald Schaefer [DCSS] > > > > Looks good to me too. Gerald, thanks for looking and verifying this, > > and David, thanks for providing the patch. > > > > Applied. > > > > Thanks Gerald and Heiko! Should I send an addon patch to tweak the > documentation or resend this patch? Please send an addon patch. I will merge it.