From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB61C433DF for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 08:32:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7CF9207FF for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 08:32:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C7CF9207FF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=de.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 521118D0062; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 04:32:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 4D0338D005E; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 04:32:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 3E69F8D0062; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 04:32:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0016.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.16]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A908D005E for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 04:32:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin27.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C25181AC9C6 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 08:32:05 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76996097010.27.crow30_1e06ca426e90 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin27.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A1573D66B for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 08:32:05 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: crow30_1e06ca426e90 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4567 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by imf18.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 08:32:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pps.filterd (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 06383jRL065716; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 04:32:03 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 32121r646e-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 03 Jul 2020 04:32:03 -0400 Received: from m0187473.ppops.net (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 06383jEB065715; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 04:32:02 -0400 Received: from ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (62.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 32121r644y-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 03 Jul 2020 04:32:02 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0638VK5v004231; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 08:31:59 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3217b01evx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 03 Jul 2020 08:31:59 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 0638VuJh59768898 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 3 Jul 2020 08:31:56 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABDCE4C052; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 08:31:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A2C4C044; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 08:31:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from osiris (unknown [9.171.55.4]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 08:31:56 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 10:31:54 +0200 From: Heiko Carstens To: Andrew Morton Cc: David Hildenbrand , Mike Rapoport , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/memblock: expose only miminal interface to add/walk physmem Message-ID: <20200703083154.GD4582@osiris> References: <20200701141830.18749-1-david@redhat.com> <20200701141830.18749-2-david@redhat.com> <20200701150643.GA2999146@linux.ibm.com> <20200701153157.GC5008@osiris> <9a6728b2-05d3-0e98-dc45-a3e4821e0539@redhat.com> <20200702214852.f6ab03dc8d072abf35359d3b@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200702214852.f6ab03dc8d072abf35359d3b@linux-foundation.org> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235,18.0.687 definitions=2020-07-03_02:2020-07-02,2020-07-03 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=999 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=1 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2007030059 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8A1573D66B X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 09:48:52PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 09:23:10 +0200 David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > >>> --- > > >>> arch/s390/kernel/crash_dump.c | 6 ++-- > > >>> include/linux/memblock.h | 28 ++++++++++++++--- > > >>> mm/memblock.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++----------------- > > >>> 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) > > > > > > So I guess this should go via the s390 tree, since the second patch of > > > this series can go only upstream if both this patch and a patch which > > > is currently only on our features are merged before. > > > > > > Any objections? > > > > @Andrew, fine with you if this goes via the s390 tree? > > Sure, please go ahead. Ok, applied both patches. Thanks!