From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C68C433DF for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2020 12:00:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D64C20708 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2020 12:00:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="g62WjDbH" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8D64C20708 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id E0A276B0062; Sun, 5 Jul 2020 08:00:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id DB89D6B0070; Sun, 5 Jul 2020 08:00:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id CCE7D6B0071; Sun, 5 Jul 2020 08:00:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0110.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.110]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65826B0062 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2020 08:00:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin10.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED5D180AD801 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2020 12:00:06 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77003878812.10.cub59_520f01b26ea3 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2751B16A0BE for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2020 12:00:06 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: cub59_520f01b26ea3 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2251 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf27.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2020 12:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kernel.org (unknown [87.71.40.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDE7120720; Sun, 5 Jul 2020 12:00:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1593950404; bh=kCtDzGa6sESwkqW1jS5Ju+PECnwelbhLFgAQ84cF3nA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=g62WjDbHSaKq+tJl/R6v6SJO0VGXo9S+jNEd+biGStIJrFnb8YxmPM8SiCVQRZs+T wCOkUpvw1hN8T07/GuA0Y5HVOwIDqidEpzT1zaF5+BimawG15JjLzzOQJrWS2GJTMk n5k8Y8w+y2xyUR5C6RMAStgIekUMFDIhMuhc7P7w= Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2020 14:59:58 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Linux MM , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , Wolfram Sang , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: Documentation (mm & i2c) questions (doubled words) Message-ID: <20200705115958.GH2999148@kernel.org> References: <187c35da-041e-dcf3-d14e-7046f57d0606@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <187c35da-041e-dcf3-d14e-7046f57d0606@infradead.org> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 2751B16A0BE X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 10:12:06AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > for MM: > > in Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst: > line 132-133: > > If that directory is not present, the system either does not not provide > a memory-side cache, or that information is not accessible to the kernel. > > Is the double negative done on purpose or is it a typo/mistake? It's a typo. > for I2C: > > in Documentation/i2c/upgrading-clients.rst: > line 10-11: > > This guide outlines how to alter existing Linux 2.6 client drivers from > the old to the new new binding methods. > ^^^^^^^ > > Is this like "really new" or newer than new? or just a simple mistake? > > > thanks. > > -- > ~Randy > > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.