From: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm, memcg: provide a stat to describe reclaimable memory
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 14:10:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200715131048.GA176092@chrisdown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.23.453.2007142018150.2667860@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Hi David,
I'm somewhat against adding more metrics which try to approximate availability
of memory when we already know it not to generally manifest very well in
practice, especially since this *is* calculable by userspace (albeit with some
knowledge of mm internals). Users and applications often vastly overestimate
the reliability of these metrics, especially since they heavily depend on
transient page states and whatever reclaim efficacy happens to be achieved at
the time there is demand.
What do you intend to do with these metrics and how do you envisage other users
should use them? Is it not possible to rework the strategy to use pressure
information and/or workingset pressurisation instead?
Thanks,
Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-15 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-15 3:18 [patch] mm, memcg: provide a stat to describe reclaimable memory David Rientjes
2020-07-15 7:00 ` David Rientjes
2020-07-15 7:15 ` SeongJae Park
2020-07-15 17:33 ` David Rientjes
2020-07-16 20:58 ` [patch] mm, memcg: provide an anon_reclaimable stat David Rientjes
2020-07-16 21:07 ` Shakeel Butt
2020-07-16 21:28 ` David Rientjes
2020-07-17 1:37 ` Shakeel Butt
2020-07-17 8:34 ` Michal Hocko
2020-07-17 14:39 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-07-15 13:10 ` Chris Down [this message]
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.23.453.2007151046320.2788464@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
2020-07-17 12:17 ` [patch] mm, memcg: provide a stat to describe reclaimable memory Chris Down
2020-07-17 19:37 ` David Rientjes
2020-07-20 7:37 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200715131048.GA176092@chrisdown.name \
--to=chris@chrisdown.name \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).