From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5B6C433E3 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A4F20774 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="eDBzzyNh" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 55A4F20774 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 59F3F6B0006; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 05:37:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 5515B8D0001; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 05:37:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 43FA16B0008; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 05:37:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0036.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.36]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE6D6B0006 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 05:37:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin20.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4FB7EFE3 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:37:18 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77137784556.20.linen98_130231d26fe1 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin20.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A330180BFBA1 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:37:18 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: linen98_130231d26fe1 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 6397 Received: from mail-lf1-f66.google.com (mail-lf1-f66.google.com [209.85.167.66]) by imf39.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf1-f66.google.com with SMTP id d2so6306556lfj.1 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 02:37:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=jyqjm7MAzhQ3nnePU/10oWI0rEHykjVg/18CrR2oPos=; b=eDBzzyNhimMlo4MpkT4QbEmki2yhiFW1guzXdVUN5DJ7MKRH5Ax4gHZPpKSVTimFuC bp2kN9jErzFnvxNQqN4oJs/fjG60RfZUcM2Be3P0BwUATzrRgMeCyw1EFNzSF0Rx7xcm FHHQDiQi8NFFxTLivE9o8VcKAhQ7zrElBHQL8ryd+AitDIPkrYR5u13LlYcdWR9S9dv8 Aw2jfPuyigFB4t1+zx3/u6DBrCsvunow+Xri0iv+MSaFyaHIhWwzVoVQt3t6EdD0SO0c Lui+dygKqMlyxbb0TmOfLLvjm3Zx/+687AYAH1vt5Y88+0QkihiD78SCG/0AaW+x8R4d ndmA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=jyqjm7MAzhQ3nnePU/10oWI0rEHykjVg/18CrR2oPos=; b=GppLKPWyA61MoR/cmriz8AGL+lZNVdH+o/+dWr6EbtJNCNVXPiEAYgvQ3nZtL9hLwH mqvrrxORtWoNNa4zeTPgL0pwD4xSEN3UrDoqEl6dFCoIEEEsKKpKoLgzYYsDcLYA3FhE bdhFbFt+HIXAk0YQwdSU0d5kZ4Kf4OulwKCpFjDJBt9U+37Nf2+1nFJKSCCbyOtw1eI0 HDGjhAiusgcVo4RYNfs4AtlxrqV91D+ryMWA5LemnC6paAsvPh9kAkFbyxC27a4/JIxM o9OdDI6oYRCOe7BMgDBMqN0WFtfsyiypSjNKjN+I9gVwQ391ouTUcsH/XnHcXjSLvmFt idUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531OhDXa72pz6LfYwwvNy9vOK7kH3kCARVrN6Eiv3YZIenQFdmSp l6vG9u/6ymt03uyNlvpPo8A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwOihTrWa6KyXKHuSbZNCRlmi2scLJjBw6d8/jPG6IOyiQbKDuuFhgG5kD9u+eN1XvHhR6W2A== X-Received: by 2002:a19:f207:: with SMTP id q7mr2660972lfh.148.1597138636529; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 02:37:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc636 (h5ef52e31.seluork.dyn.perspektivbredband.net. [94.245.46.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t19sm9890595ljc.137.2020.08.11.02.37.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 11 Aug 2020 02:37:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Uladzislau Rezki X-Google-Original-From: Uladzislau Rezki Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:37:13 +0200 To: Michal Hocko Cc: Uladzislau Rezki , LKML , RCU , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Vlastimil Babka , "Paul E . McKenney" , Matthew Wilcox , "Theodore Y . Ts'o" , Joel Fernandes , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Oleksiy Avramchenko Subject: Re: [RFC-PATCH 1/2] mm: Add __GFP_NO_LOCKS flag Message-ID: <20200811093713.GB2634@pc636> References: <20200809204354.20137-1-urezki@gmail.com> <20200809204354.20137-2-urezki@gmail.com> <20200810123141.GF4773@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200810160739.GA29884@pc636> <20200810192525.GG4773@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200811081917.GG4793@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200811081917.GG4793@dhcp22.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6A330180BFBA1 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 10:19:17AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 10-08-20 21:25:26, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Mon 10-08-20 18:07:39, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > [...] > > > The problem that i see is we can not use the page allocator from atomic > > > contexts, what is our case: > > > > > > > > > local_irq_save(flags) or preempt_disable() or raw_spinlock(); > > > __get_free_page(GFP_ATOMIC); > > > > > > > > > So if we can convert the page allocator to raw_* lock it will be appreciated, > > > at least from our side, IMHO, not from RT one. But as i stated above we need > > > to sort raised questions out if converting is done. > > > > > > What is your view? > > > > To me it would make more sense to support atomic allocations also for > > the RT tree. Having both GFP_NOWAIT and GFP_ATOMIC which do not really > > work for atomic context in RT sounds subtle and wrong. > > I was thinking about this some more. I still think the above would be a > reasonable goal we should try to achieve. If for not other then for > future maintainability (especially after the RT patchset is merged). > I have tried to search for any known problems/attempts to make > zone->lock raw but couldn't find anything. Maybe somebody more involved > in RT world have something to say about that. > I tried yesterday to convert zone->lock. See below files i had to modify: modified: include/linux/mmzone.h modified: mm/compaction.c modified: mm/memory_hotplug.c modified: mm/page_alloc.c modified: mm/page_isolation.c modified: mm/page_reporting.c modified: mm/shuffle.c modified: mm/vmscan.c modified: mm/vmstat.c There is one more lock, that is zone->lru_lock one. Both zone->lock and this one intersect between each other. If the lru_lock can be nested under zone->lock it should be converted as well. But i need to analyze it farther. There are two wrapper functions which are used as common interface to lock/unlock both locks. See compact_lock_irqsave()/compact_unlock_should_abort_lru() in the mm/compaction.c. Any thoughts here? Anyway i tried to convert only zone->lock and use page allocator passing there gfp_mask=0 as argument. So it works. CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING does not complain about any "bad" lock nesting. > Anyway, if the zone->lock is not a good fit for raw_spin_lock then the > only way I can see forward is to detect real (RT) atomic contexts and > bail out early before taking the lock in the allocator for NOWAIT/ATOMIC > requests. > For RT kernel we can detect it for sure. preemtable() works just fine there, i.e. we can identify the context we are currently in. Thanks! -- Vlad Rezki