From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>,
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] mm: clean up some lru related pieces
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:01:26 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200918210126.GA1118730@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.11.2009181317350.11298@eggly.anvils>
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 01:46:59PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2020, Yu Zhao wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > I see you have taken this:
> > mm: use add_page_to_lru_list()/page_lru()/page_off_lru()
> > Do you mind dropping it?
> >
> > Michal asked to do a bit of additional work. So I thought I probably
> > should create a series to do more cleanups I've been meaning to.
> >
> > This series contains the change in the patch above and goes a few
> > more steps farther. It's intended to improve readability and should
> > not have any performance impacts. There are minor behavior changes in
> > terms of debugging and error reporting, which I have all highlighted
> > in the individual patches. All patches were properly tested on 5.8
> > running Chrome OS, with various debug options turned on.
> >
> > Michal,
> >
> > Do you mind taking a looking at the entire series?
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Yu Zhao (13):
> > mm: use add_page_to_lru_list()
> > mm: use page_off_lru()
> > mm: move __ClearPageLRU() into page_off_lru()
> > mm: shuffle lru list addition and deletion functions
> > mm: don't pass enum lru_list to lru list addition functions
> > mm: don't pass enum lru_list to trace_mm_lru_insertion()
> > mm: don't pass enum lru_list to del_page_from_lru_list()
> > mm: rename page_off_lru() to __clear_page_lru_flags()
> > mm: inline page_lru_base_type()
> > mm: VM_BUG_ON lru page flags
> > mm: inline __update_lru_size()
> > mm: make lruvec_lru_size() static
> > mm: enlarge the int parameter of update_lru_size()
> >
> > include/linux/memcontrol.h | 14 ++--
> > include/linux/mm_inline.h | 115 ++++++++++++++-------------------
> > include/linux/mmzone.h | 2 -
> > include/linux/vmstat.h | 2 +-
> > include/trace/events/pagemap.h | 11 ++--
> > mm/compaction.c | 2 +-
> > mm/memcontrol.c | 10 +--
> > mm/mlock.c | 2 +-
> > mm/swap.c | 53 ++++++---------
> > mm/vmscan.c | 28 +++-----
> > 10 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.28.0.681.g6f77f65b4e-goog
>
> Sorry, Yu, I may be out-of-line in sending this: but as you know,
> Alex Shi has a long per-memcg lru_lock series playing in much the
> same area (particularly conflicting in mm/swap.c and mm/vmscan.c):
> a patchset that makes useful changes, that I'm very keen to help
> into mmotm a.s.a.p (but not before I've completed diligence).
>
> We've put a lot of effort into its testing, I'm currently reviewing
> it patch by patch (my general silence indicating that I'm busy on that,
> but slow as ever): so I'm a bit discouraged to have its stability
> potentially undermined by conflicting cleanups at this stage.
>
> If there's general agreement that your cleanups are safe and welcome
> (Michal's initial reaction sheds some doubt on that), great: I hope
> that Andrew can fast-track them into mmotm, then Alex rebase on top
> of them, and I then re-test and re-review.
>
> But if that quick agreement is not forthcoming, may I ask you please
> to hold back, and resend based on top of Alex's next posting?
The per-memcg lru lock series seems a high priority, and I have
absolutely no problem accommodate your request.
In return, may I ask you or Alex to review this series after you
have finished with per-memcg lru lock (to make sure that I resolve
all the conflicts correctly at least)?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-18 21:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-18 3:00 [PATCH 00/13] mm: clean up some lru related pieces Yu Zhao
2020-09-18 3:00 ` [PATCH 01/13] mm: use add_page_to_lru_list() Yu Zhao
2020-09-18 7:32 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-18 10:05 ` Yu Zhao
2020-09-18 3:00 ` [PATCH 02/13] mm: use page_off_lru() Yu Zhao
2020-09-18 7:37 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-18 10:27 ` Yu Zhao
2020-09-18 11:09 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-18 18:53 ` Yu Zhao
2020-09-21 11:16 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-18 11:24 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-18 3:00 ` [PATCH 03/13] mm: move __ClearPageLRU() into page_off_lru() Yu Zhao
2020-09-18 7:38 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-18 3:00 ` [PATCH 04/13] mm: shuffle lru list addition and deletion functions Yu Zhao
2020-09-18 3:00 ` [PATCH 05/13] mm: don't pass enum lru_list to lru list addition functions Yu Zhao
2020-09-18 3:00 ` [PATCH 06/13] mm: don't pass enum lru_list to trace_mm_lru_insertion() Yu Zhao
2020-09-18 3:00 ` [PATCH 07/13] mm: don't pass enum lru_list to del_page_from_lru_list() Yu Zhao
2020-09-18 3:00 ` [PATCH 08/13] mm: rename page_off_lru() to __clear_page_lru_flags() Yu Zhao
2020-09-18 3:00 ` [PATCH 09/13] mm: inline page_lru_base_type() Yu Zhao
2020-09-18 3:00 ` [PATCH 10/13] mm: VM_BUG_ON lru page flags Yu Zhao
2020-09-18 3:00 ` [PATCH 11/13] mm: inline __update_lru_size() Yu Zhao
2020-09-18 3:00 ` [PATCH 12/13] mm: make lruvec_lru_size() static Yu Zhao
2020-09-18 3:00 ` [PATCH 13/13] mm: enlarge the int parameter of update_lru_size() Yu Zhao
2020-09-18 7:45 ` [PATCH 00/13] mm: clean up some lru related pieces Michal Hocko
2020-09-18 9:36 ` Yu Zhao
2020-09-18 20:46 ` Hugh Dickins
2020-09-18 21:01 ` Yu Zhao [this message]
2020-09-18 21:19 ` Hugh Dickins
2020-09-19 0:31 ` Alex Shi
2020-10-13 2:30 ` Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200918210126.GA1118730@google.com \
--to=yuzhao@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chris@chrisdown.name \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jaewon31.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=koct9i@gmail.com \
--cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).