From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@suse.de, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
mhocko@kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm, fadvise: improve the expensive remote LRU cache draining after FADV_DONTNEED
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:43:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200921014317.73915-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com> (raw)
Our users reported that there're some random latency spikes when their RT
process is running. Finally we found that latency spike is caused by
FADV_DONTNEED. Which may call lru_add_drain_all() to drain LRU cache on
remote CPUs, and then waits the per-cpu work to complete. The wait time
is uncertain, which may be tens millisecond.
That behavior is unreasonable, because this process is bound to a
specific CPU and the file is only accessed by itself, IOW, there should
be no pagecache pages on a per-cpu pagevec of a remote CPU. That
unreasonable behavior is partially caused by the wrong comparation of the
number of invalidated pages and the number of the target. For example,
if (count < (end_index - start_index + 1))
The count above is how many pages were invalidated in the local CPU, and
(end_index - start_index + 1) is how many pages should be invalidated.
The usage of (end_index - start_index + 1) is incorrect, because they
are virtual addresses, which may not mapped to pages. We'd better use
inode->i_data.nrpages as the target.
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
---
mm/fadvise.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/fadvise.c b/mm/fadvise.c
index 0e66f2aaeea3..ec25c91194a3 100644
--- a/mm/fadvise.c
+++ b/mm/fadvise.c
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ int generic_fadvise(struct file *file, loff_t offset, loff_t len, int advice)
* a per-cpu pagevec for a remote CPU. Drain all
* pagevecs and try again.
*/
- if (count < (end_index - start_index + 1)) {
+ if (count < inode->i_data.nrpages) {
lru_add_drain_all();
invalidate_mapping_pages(mapping, start_index,
end_index);
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-09-21 1:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-21 1:43 Yafang Shao [this message]
2020-09-21 22:34 ` [PATCH] mm, fadvise: improve the expensive remote LRU cache draining after FADV_DONTNEED Mel Gorman
2020-09-22 2:12 ` Yafang Shao
2020-09-22 7:23 ` Mel Gorman
2020-09-23 10:05 ` Yafang Shao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200921014317.73915-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--to=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).