linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: REGRESSION: 37f4a24c2469: blk-mq: centralise related handling into blk_mq_get_driver_tag
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 15:31:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200925073145.GC2388140@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200925011311.GJ482521@mit.edu>

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 09:13:11PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:33:45AM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> > HOWEVER, thanks to a hint from a colleague at $WORK, and realizing
> > that one of the stack traces had virtio balloon in the trace, I
> > realized that when I switched the GCE VM type from e1-standard-2 to
> > n1-standard-2 (where e1 VM's are cheaper because they use
> > virtio-balloon to better manage host OS memory utilization), problem
> > has become, much, *much* rarer (and possibly has gone away, although
> > I'm going to want to run a lot more tests before I say that
> > conclusively) on my test setup.  At the very least, using an n1 VM
> > (which doesn't have virtio-balloon enabled in the hypervisor) is
> > enough to unblock ext4 development.
> 
> .... and I spoke too soon.  A number of runs using -rc6 are now
> failing even with the n1-standard-2 VM, so virtio-ballon may not be an
> indicator.
> 
> This is why debugging this is frustrating; it is very much a heisenbug
> --- although 5.8 seems to work completely reliably, as does commits
> before 37f4a24c2469.  Anything after that point will show random
> failures.  :-(

It does not make sense to mention 37f4a24c2469, which is reverted in
4e2f62e566b5. Later the patch in 37f4a24c2469 is fixed and re-commited
as 568f27006577.

However, I can _not_ reproduce the issue by running the same test on
kernel built from 568f27006577 directly.

Also you have confirmed that the issue can't be fixed after reverting
568f27006577 against v5.9-rc4.

Looks the real issue(slab list corruption) should be introduced between
568f27006577 and v5.9-rc4.


thanks,
Ming



       reply	other threads:[~2020-09-25  7:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20200915044519.GA38283@mit.edu>
     [not found] ` <20200915073303.GA754106@T590>
     [not found]   ` <20200915224541.GB38283@mit.edu>
     [not found]     ` <20200915230941.GA791425@T590>
     [not found]       ` <20200916202026.GC38283@mit.edu>
     [not found]         ` <20200917022051.GA1004828@T590>
     [not found]           ` <20200917143012.GF38283@mit.edu>
     [not found]             ` <20200924005901.GB1806978@T590>
     [not found]               ` <20200924143345.GD482521@mit.edu>
     [not found]                 ` <20200925011311.GJ482521@mit.edu>
2020-09-25  7:31                   ` Ming Lei [this message]
2020-09-25 16:19                     ` REGRESSION: 37f4a24c2469: blk-mq: centralise related handling into blk_mq_get_driver_tag Ming Lei
2020-09-25 16:32                       ` Shakeel Butt
2020-09-25 16:47                         ` Shakeel Butt
2020-09-25 17:22                           ` Roman Gushchin
2020-09-25 17:17                       ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-25 17:22                         ` Shakeel Butt
2020-09-25 17:35                           ` Shakeel Butt
2020-09-25 17:47                             ` Roman Gushchin
2020-09-25 17:58                               ` Shakeel Butt
2020-09-25 19:19                                 ` Shakeel Butt
2020-09-25 20:56                                   ` Roman Gushchin
2020-09-25 21:18                                     ` Shakeel Butt
2020-09-27 17:38                                       ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-09-26  1:43                                   ` Ming Lei
2020-09-26  6:42                                     ` Roman Gushchin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200925073145.GC2388140@T590 \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).