linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: PageLRU and the other flags
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 16:00:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200925150050.GF32101@casper.infradead.org> (raw)

I'm not quite familiar with this side of the MM yet, but it seems to
me like we're encoding four page states in three bits:

 - !PageLRU (not an LRU page)
 - PageLRU (on the inactive list)
 - PageLRU + PageActive (on the active list)
 - PageLRU + PageUnevictable (on the unevictable list)

Can we neaten this up into two bits?

 - 00 (not an LRU page)
 - 01 (active list)
 - 10 (inactive list)
 - 11 (unevictable)

People who free up page flags are always popular, right?

I don't think the missing combos are used:

!LRU + Active
!LRU + Active + Unevictable
!LRU + Unevictable
LRU + Active + Unevictable

It seems fairly straightforward to add these macros:

bool PageLRU(struct page *page)
{
	page->flags & PAGE_FLAGS_LRU_MASK;
}

bool PageActive(struct page *page)
{
	page->flags & PAGE_FLAGS_LRU_MASK == PAGE_FLAGS_ACTIVE;
}

bool PageInactive(struct page *page)
{
	page->flags & PAGE_FLAGS_LRU_MASK == PAGE_FLAGS_INACTIVE;
}

bool PageUnevictable(struct page *page)
{
	page->flags & PAGE_FLAGS_LRU_MASK == PAGE_FLAGS_UNEVICTABLE;
}

SetPageActive seems a little more tricky to do atomically.  A cmpxchg()
loop, perhaps?  If we changed the API to be PageUnevictableToActive(page)
then it's an atomic subtraction / addition (although it's now twelve
macro instead of six Set/Clear for three bits).  Then I'm not sure how
to do TestClearPageActive().  Maybe TryPageActiveToInactive()?  That'd be
another twelve macros if all those state transitions are possible.


             reply	other threads:[~2020-09-25 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-25 15:00 Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2020-09-25 15:21 ` PageLRU and the other flags David Hildenbrand
2020-09-25 15:44   ` Yang Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200925150050.GF32101@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).