From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: PageLRU and the other flags
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 16:00:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200925150050.GF32101@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
I'm not quite familiar with this side of the MM yet, but it seems to
me like we're encoding four page states in three bits:
- !PageLRU (not an LRU page)
- PageLRU (on the inactive list)
- PageLRU + PageActive (on the active list)
- PageLRU + PageUnevictable (on the unevictable list)
Can we neaten this up into two bits?
- 00 (not an LRU page)
- 01 (active list)
- 10 (inactive list)
- 11 (unevictable)
People who free up page flags are always popular, right?
I don't think the missing combos are used:
!LRU + Active
!LRU + Active + Unevictable
!LRU + Unevictable
LRU + Active + Unevictable
It seems fairly straightforward to add these macros:
bool PageLRU(struct page *page)
{
page->flags & PAGE_FLAGS_LRU_MASK;
}
bool PageActive(struct page *page)
{
page->flags & PAGE_FLAGS_LRU_MASK == PAGE_FLAGS_ACTIVE;
}
bool PageInactive(struct page *page)
{
page->flags & PAGE_FLAGS_LRU_MASK == PAGE_FLAGS_INACTIVE;
}
bool PageUnevictable(struct page *page)
{
page->flags & PAGE_FLAGS_LRU_MASK == PAGE_FLAGS_UNEVICTABLE;
}
SetPageActive seems a little more tricky to do atomically. A cmpxchg()
loop, perhaps? If we changed the API to be PageUnevictableToActive(page)
then it's an atomic subtraction / addition (although it's now twelve
macro instead of six Set/Clear for three bits). Then I'm not sure how
to do TestClearPageActive(). Maybe TryPageActiveToInactive()? That'd be
another twelve macros if all those state transitions are possible.
next reply other threads:[~2020-09-25 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-25 15:00 Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2020-09-25 15:21 ` PageLRU and the other flags David Hildenbrand
2020-09-25 15:44 ` Yang Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200925150050.GF32101@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).