From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 920A9C4727E for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 23:24:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C792184D for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 23:24:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ziepe.ca header.i=@ziepe.ca header.b="Bk3vyARb" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 07C792184D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ziepe.ca Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 26D1D8E0001; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 19:24:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 21EFA6B005D; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 19:24:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 0E6418E0001; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 19:24:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0151.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.151]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6CD26B005C for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 19:24:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin22.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 628731EF1 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 23:24:51 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77346711582.22.bead27_2211ec8271d3 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin22.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3967518038E60 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 23:24:51 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: bead27_2211ec8271d3 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 5555 Received: from mail-qt1-f195.google.com (mail-qt1-f195.google.com [209.85.160.195]) by imf39.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 23:24:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt1-f195.google.com with SMTP id g3so3558022qtq.10 for ; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 16:24:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ziepe.ca; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=grnZFDXCMGq7gJnj3rv4Eh6ohpICuLZnEtrVn22rZIo=; b=Bk3vyARb7iuiAU0SAUq2s6xtQRFkx0zrhk9G+DPyvRRbTItWJ6gpJPPsdXndWqM30C q+51nknw/1tIIM/cbEQqZbvmH3mHkhAx0ZhbONTIkwW+SkBnLf5drgGQk3B1JkUtZLQv md+QvQFk56zu60Z3GjZl1EqhU0rhhNSdsHAK30qke9EYBs5AaSpcAL2z/rCUCwa8FQqH 2eNBU8guUIVdzfovxzjr065TJHAf7Ql5Nk2Q1fuOqG9vuautugZBwiS50HM9Bf6R7BJy wX6YvRVCp5ueNYkN+1r4/AuMm2/5dBOzuXJknmpl6H2z8DDtJhmovZxfsbStATmFT07H 6VSA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=grnZFDXCMGq7gJnj3rv4Eh6ohpICuLZnEtrVn22rZIo=; b=OZW2vzvXFvCI0zFGdjWfz5do+wXZbQysI/+G3bVyV/R2/Q+kUcRnNOb04eucuaX+Pz kihDadDh251McVux5IG/7Guvz0p5GibPiJjX6FGcXKOKEJ739JRhVDrrZfc/f6CssVa4 sDa3m3AH3+oE1XObXVfLR85XRHOe8l5FDjWo8l8370JfGNwCDSCT7O6WZtP38etHSFp5 gE7PO0aYSWU12YnzQFtvJYxEATq0zQ2yKLexmztwJWMzE7O+7rBFuCY0LPOdParXE1c1 DCIndesOrRrK1ZCixIjZRZ4JvKfDnngw0oEStEcwX+R0JOSqOdjl/pX0+CGu5rCm0TjX Fteg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532xgt/sI4ZqAil/cQTxUVjalhz0fBBrYCzLVtZCN8+yazzqY/W6 FMO047Rls2xxftbSn8Hn6WhmzA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQSs4RGdtelbtYNd2YLomE1YhjE8V063EOvVpVE89mpXbPIH2mKCjwjLbwP7cugbXVynYwbw== X-Received: by 2002:aed:3282:: with SMTP id z2mr6021380qtd.375.1602113090013; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 16:24:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ziepe.ca (hlfxns017vw-156-34-48-30.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.ns.bellaliant.net. [156.34.48.30]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r17sm2946100qtc.22.2020.10.07.16.24.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 07 Oct 2020 16:24:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jgg by mlx with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kQIng-001Ing-AW; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 20:24:48 -0300 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 20:24:48 -0300 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Dan Williams Cc: Daniel Vetter , DRI Development , LKML , KVM list , Linux MM , Linux ARM , linux-samsung-soc , "Linux-media@vger.kernel.org" , linux-s390 , Daniel Vetter , Kees Cook , Andrew Morton , John Hubbard , =?utf-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWU=?= Glisse , Jan Kara , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] PCI: revoke mappings like devmem Message-ID: <20201007232448.GC5177@ziepe.ca> References: <20201007164426.1812530-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <20201007164426.1812530-11-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 12:33:06PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 11:11 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > Since 3234ac664a87 ("/dev/mem: Revoke mappings when a driver claims > > the region") /dev/kmem zaps ptes when the kernel requests exclusive > > acccess to an iomem region. And with CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM, this is > > the default for all driver uses. > > > > Except there's two more ways to access pci bars: sysfs and proc mmap > > support. Let's plug that hole. > > Ooh, yes, lets. > > > > > For revoke_devmem() to work we need to link our vma into the same > > address_space, with consistent vma->vm_pgoff. ->pgoff is already > > adjusted, because that's how (io_)remap_pfn_range works, but for the > > mapping we need to adjust vma->vm_file->f_mapping. Usually that's done > > at ->open time, but that's a bit tricky here with all the entry points > > and arch code. So instead create a fake file and adjust vma->vm_file. > > I don't think you want to share the devmem inode for this, this should > be based off the sysfs inode which I believe there is already only one > instance per resource. In contrast /dev/mem can have multiple inodes > because anyone can just mknod a new character device file, the same > problem does not exist for sysfs. The inode does not come from the filesystem char/mem.c creates a singular anon inode in devmem_init_inode() Seems OK to use this more widely, but it feels a bit weird to live in char/memory.c. This is what got me thinking maybe this needs to be a bit bigger generic infrastructure - eg enter this scheme from fops mmap and everything else is in mm/user_iomem.c Jason