From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E117C55179 for ; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 08:39:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D8420704 for ; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 08:39:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Q1MJkrA4" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 39D8420704 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 8FEFD6B0036; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 03:39:44 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 888B76B005D; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 03:39:44 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 777D66B0068; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 03:39:44 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0169.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.169]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419906B0036 for ; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 03:39:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin18.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D687C1EE6 for ; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 08:39:43 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77456973846.18.pies41_210009e272d9 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin18.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B6A100ED0F8 for ; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 08:39:43 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: pies41_210009e272d9 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 6601 Received: from mail-pf1-f194.google.com (mail-pf1-f194.google.com [209.85.210.194]) by imf45.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 08:39:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf1-f194.google.com with SMTP id a18so3704094pfl.3 for ; Sat, 07 Nov 2020 00:39:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=zIMBOiLbdItdg+48kpCIygPkMR3TPO8xi/V7tkVxarw=; b=Q1MJkrA4DDlLPKPOVjja9yqaL48rkY8+AopbUnmYjeAss/uW93GnGdXvXW3h5EMoBm sfMQCDL5zqMgXISj6HDKWUtH4d9KXEXx3EvLv4znlsAYVo5X08pjm0cRvHyArXPlzw+K YPfoIV125OzqVs96lNgPM+OwwoSVRLPCvYlkcEUmVDjsxxV76aZU424wstERnbjJ2yk7 /6R+GXytHmojMhfet00peordD/giAsVhFiU3lKxzNEGPpwabRkdYkTw2ok23h+U5Vnqe eHcSCwaro8jCgtq30U5M3AFm6Re433c8TbJjv90iq9OWR84Jnx+27y/OHXtW499aMRMb pYSg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=zIMBOiLbdItdg+48kpCIygPkMR3TPO8xi/V7tkVxarw=; b=uL+1uTElS+Eocct4ZIO/GawhiljUg6nJDfAfCfDdu+BzYnfCzGAerQsmr5wcWHOLvp CffCC1xR6DSbK4nEQcKnsZsI+W+C0tlNzTkoWrNGwNhrIOuCXhcqabkPl+meSRMNqPZ9 fgdPcYn7BUqeJp23RY7p0/qYHX866FBhEIW5dRX4JdQwn5bQQfW6Nhuc4uzEyRno9U7L H2CwfaxjJFQ3WpzN7vRkFz8J/hfNnTuxN8+IJ5n0Uzq8vZwHZvPKgKkdck0M+jAlzpl7 DZRp9yhay9C4L7iCHmppgWC9+gp7P+EAuS4zGVPrZETkcmz33paf/8BEQYjAexIhAOi5 v+7w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533kXjeaofZWnbyZLyYBfq1rurEZgAnzTPPmLhvQBt+mCZZh49ch VlV5ntkJkG2R/US4x4FcZLiUmYnM/0w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwzEwyc5AdMfUtIacIn/a2s5UjdZjDOgwLBm0t/39XVoeu+PD1k4dsPebw6nJrCBXcZcn7ulQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:fb50:: with SMTP id w16mr4760055pgj.202.1604738382137; Sat, 07 Nov 2020 00:39:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:211:201:7220:84ff:fe09:5e58]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v23sm4694682pfn.141.2020.11.07.00.39.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 07 Nov 2020 00:39:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2020 00:39:39 -0800 From: Minchan Kim To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm , "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , Harish Sriram , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "mm/vunmap: add cond_resched() in vunmap_pmd_range" Message-ID: <20201107083939.GA1633068@google.com> References: <20201105170249.387069-1-minchan@kernel.org> <20201106175933.90e4c8851010c9ce4dd732b6@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201106175933.90e4c8851010c9ce4dd732b6@linux-foundation.org> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi Andrew, On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 05:59:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 09:02:49 -0800 Minchan Kim wrote: > > > This reverts commit e47110e90584a22e9980510b00d0dfad3a83354e. > > > > While I was doing zram testing, I found sometimes decompression failed > > since the compression buffer was corrupted. With investigation, > > I found below commit calls cond_resched unconditionally so it could > > make a problem in atomic context if the task is reschedule. > > > > Revert the original commit for now. > > > > [ 55.109012] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/vmalloc.c:108 > > [ 55.110774] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 946, name: memhog > > [ 55.111973] 3 locks held by memhog/946: > > [ 55.112807] #0: ffff9d01d4b193e8 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{4:4}, at: __mm_populate+0x103/0x160 > > [ 55.114151] #1: ffffffffa3d53de0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0xa98/0x1160 > > [ 55.115848] #2: ffff9d01d56b8110 (&zspage->lock){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: zs_map_object+0x8e/0x1f0 > > [ 55.118947] CPU: 0 PID: 946 Comm: memhog Not tainted 5.9.3-00011-gc5bfc0287345-dirty #316 > > [ 55.121265] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1 04/01/2014 > > [ 55.122540] Call Trace: > > [ 55.122974] dump_stack+0x8b/0xb8 > > [ 55.123588] ___might_sleep.cold+0xb6/0xc6 > > [ 55.124328] unmap_kernel_range_noflush+0x2eb/0x350 > > [ 55.125198] unmap_kernel_range+0x14/0x30 > > [ 55.125920] zs_unmap_object+0xd5/0xe0 > > [ 55.126604] zram_bvec_rw.isra.0+0x38c/0x8e0 > > [ 55.127462] zram_rw_page+0x90/0x101 > > [ 55.128199] bdev_write_page+0x92/0xe0 > > [ 55.128957] ? swap_slot_free_notify+0xb0/0xb0 > > [ 55.129841] __swap_writepage+0x94/0x4a0 > > [ 55.130636] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0 > > [ 55.131462] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30 > > [ 55.132261] ? page_swapcount+0x6c/0x90 > > [ 55.133038] pageout+0xe3/0x3a0 > > [ 55.133702] shrink_page_list+0xb94/0xd60 > > [ 55.134626] shrink_inactive_list+0x158/0x460 > > > > ... > > > > --- a/mm/vmalloc.c > > +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c > > @@ -102,8 +102,6 @@ static void vunmap_pmd_range(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, > > if (pmd_none_or_clear_bad(pmd)) > > continue; > > vunmap_pte_range(pmd, addr, next, mask); > > - > > - cond_resched(); > > } while (pmd++, addr = next, addr != end); > > } > > If this is triggering a warning then why isn't the might_sleep() in > remove_vm_area() also triggering? I don't understand what specific callpath you are talking but if it's clearly called in atomic context, the reason would be config combination I met. CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY + no CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP It makes preempt_count logic void so might_sleep warning will not work. > > Sigh. I also cannot remember why these vfree() functions have to be so > awkward. The mutex_trylock(&vmap_purge_lock) isn't permitted in > interrupt context because mutex_trylock() is stupid, but what was the > issue with non-interrupt atomic code? > Seems like a latency issue. commit f9e09977671b Author: Christoph Hellwig Date: Mon Dec 12 16:44:23 2016 -0800 mm: turn vmap_purge_lock into a mutex The purge_lock spinlock causes high latencies with non RT kernel,