From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4CDC2D0E4 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 18:23:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC9982245B for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 18:23:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=ziepe.ca header.i=@ziepe.ca header.b="B4hybK4y" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AC9982245B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ziepe.ca Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id DFC156B005C; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:23:19 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id DAEF66B005D; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:23:19 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id CC3F76B006C; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:23:19 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0134.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.134]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15C76B005C for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:23:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin18.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 518DA363D for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 18:23:19 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77505618918.18.park47_571159d2734d Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin18.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D037100EC665 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 18:23:19 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: park47_571159d2734d X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 6937 Received: from mail-qv1-f68.google.com (mail-qv1-f68.google.com [209.85.219.68]) by imf16.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 18:23:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qv1-f68.google.com with SMTP id v20so5125910qvx.4 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 10:23:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ziepe.ca; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=UCRF1tW/AZBL2cTgUwVNxqtk7LoMkUYo1UAbEj+RJjA=; b=B4hybK4yzaLM2Npm1+7g6r63APKMgeTYmtc+xA4iVzmdUpm8/fc6u8PaaYBUCEqsTa DQGtD0B85sfZ6AQDUGUUQC5pVjZlDUujNTP78g/UuI8FK4lpcR30mtecsvkVf7DRgiuW MlO955aCtgx98+WPuV3NTYdOklNjuBLotWjSZU4ObiQWcAx2srZjTgQUtz+nDfdm6w6W DZqPXoE1QXdh/pboRXeD4ejJgfX5GK2Q1BTBAtJtZmFj9fTPLr6v/mkTDWfR54U03nWV iXOwhBmbqACTOvfxkYtC+csJIypzFC+zmDe+YDbqWg3tSfxHioKaKSUTa24FTqD2nFIt rECQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=UCRF1tW/AZBL2cTgUwVNxqtk7LoMkUYo1UAbEj+RJjA=; b=FhHE+zjXBkDcUCIjVD9HaMr3lGR5L3fF0z6NjQF+v6VMl5glu33mT0ScDWgWFnfx7e sHzL5+qrJtbLRSlNujnNaZdGI1EUe5sV8RUGYowFMfLStzh0/plMJuH3EBd3lxweUiks ao13FP9FcB/62Scl+Myvr04vegFfw8ZF67xjjuIdN2e/nhSbDZr+3OSdalLAWDMsg1r8 5qVhwp1S/uGYbjDnYmo+LrVytcgHpv7vKKYk+0MViBvNrs5qQBMxW6f1mph9rCjVhWg9 icvtK3v0bipZTK8hJjQzKEz9JOQT6ZoNCIJS7firU9Bumnrk/+505oUcQcf2/8ZgqkEy ordw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531I07W0nAXf+93qF4mGX0JBmepJI7JedzM7IAKRdT4d8NFLUXTG UgRm5Q/GyTHkpAtT2DWzRnnZtA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyYHlJdtw+Gau+17nV3WJLVIt14si/LWrTbl0K59MDQ0saInzPp33g3U6H6OWsC2O3yX2B0AQ== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:b18a:: with SMTP id v10mr16583162qvd.46.1605896597938; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 10:23:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from ziepe.ca (hlfxns017vw-156-34-48-30.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.ns.bellaliant.net. [156.34.48.30]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v9sm2453624qkv.34.2020.11.20.10.23.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 20 Nov 2020 10:23:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from jgg by mlx with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kgB40-008ub6-IN; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 14:23:16 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 14:23:16 -0400 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Daniel Vetter Cc: DRI Development , Intel Graphics Development , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Dave Chinner , Qian Cai , Thomas =?utf-8?Q?Hellstr=C3=B6m?= , Andrew Morton , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Maarten Lankhorst , Christian =?utf-8?B?S8O2bmln?= , "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" , Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: Track mmu notifiers in fs_reclaim_acquire/release Message-ID: <20201120182316.GP244516@ziepe.ca> References: <20201120095445.1195585-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <20201120095445.1195585-2-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201120095445.1195585-2-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:54:42AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > fs_reclaim_acquire/release nicely catch recursion issues when > allocating GFP_KERNEL memory against shrinkers (which gpu drivers tend > to use to keep the excessive caches in check). For mmu notifier > recursions we do have lockdep annotations since 23b68395c7c7 > ("mm/mmu_notifiers: add a lockdep map for invalidate_range_start/end"). >=20 > But these only fire if a path actually results in some pte > invalidation - for most small allocations that's very rarely the case. > The other trouble is that pte invalidation can happen any time when > __GFP_RECLAIM is set. Which means only really GFP_ATOMIC is a safe > choice, GFP_NOIO isn't good enough to avoid potential mmu notifier > recursion. >=20 > I was pondering whether we should just do the general annotation, but > there's always the risk for false positives. Plus I'm assuming that > the core fs and io code is a lot better reviewed and tested than > random mmu notifier code in drivers. Hence why I decide to only > annotate for that specific case. >=20 > Furthermore even if we'd create a lockdep map for direct reclaim, we'd > still need to explicit pull in the mmu notifier map - there's a lot > more places that do pte invalidation than just direct reclaim, these > two contexts arent the same. >=20 > Note that the mmu notifiers needing their own independent lockdep map > is also the reason we can't hold them from fs_reclaim_acquire to > fs_reclaim_release - it would nest with the acquistion in the pte > invalidation code, causing a lockdep splat. And we can't remove the > annotations from pte invalidation and all the other places since > they're called from many other places than page reclaim. Hence we can > only do the equivalent of might_lock, but on the raw lockdep map. >=20 > With this we can also remove the lockdep priming added in 66204f1d2d1b > ("mm/mmu_notifiers: prime lockdep") since the new annotations are > strictly more powerful. >=20 > v2: Review from Thomas Hellstrom: > - unbotch the fs_reclaim context check, I accidentally inverted it, > but it didn't blow up because I inverted it immediately > - fix compiling for !CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER >=20 > v3: Unbreak the PF_MEMALLOC_ context flags. Thanks to Qian for the > report and Dave for explaining what I failed to see. >=20 > Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Dave Chinner > Cc: Qian Cai > Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Thomas Hellstr=C3=B6m (Intel) > Cc: Andrew Morton > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe > Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org > Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst > Cc: Christian K=C3=B6nig > Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > --- > mm/mmu_notifier.c | 7 ------- > mm/page_alloc.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe Jason